Facebook executives admit meddling with election, backing Biden

submitted by MarcoPolo from oann.com

all 31 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Four years earlier the Trump campaign paid many millions to advertise and astroturf on Facebook. This time around Biden's minions paid more. It's all about the shekels.

[–]adultmanhwa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

considering they hate trump so much, I believe no matter how much shekels he paid he'll still losing

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source for that allegation?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

By now it should be abundantly obvious that Project Veritas and OANN have absolutely no creditiblity because they only post disinformation and misinformation. If there were a "truth in advertising" law that applied to fascist propaganda websites, these two websites would be out of business. But what about free speech? OK: re-establish the Freedom of Information Act, so that these websites are required to include counter-arguments from others, along with their lies.

[–]adultmanhwa 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

PV and OANN ... because they only post disinfo ...

are you stupid or what? they (at least PV) literally record the conversations of big tech tyrants without them knowing and present them to the people. It's not like a fucking opionion pieces out of wapo, cnn, etc.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Look at it this way, genius: an you corroborate any of the propaganda with any reliable sources? And for the recordings, guess how much they're edited to fit the misleading or false narrative. Think critically about your sources. They don't have reliable evidence.

[–]a_rogue_modron 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Credible sources: The people desperately trying to cover their asses and fire anyone who might be talking about what's going on behind the curtain.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you'd rather trust the groups that are obviously lying to you?

[–]Bigs 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The obvious liar I see round here is YOU.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Its tyrdheads alt

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ah...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sticks and stones, Bigs. Bring an argument and evidence to the discussion or chill.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

They have the fuckers on video; that's reliable enough for me.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've obviously spun the story into misleading and false arguments. Keep in mind that the MSM and social media helped elect Twittler and many Republicans, because of the way stories hit the front page. The same process exposed these assholes over 4 years, and thus Biden - though he's 150 years old - was the only other alternative. It's not that complicated.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

But its a fact so it does not need any evidences

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Au contraire mon frère, evidences are readily at hand for facts

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    You OK, mate?

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Not since I met you.

      Not sure if I should be honored or concerned that an anonymous person(?) has been so deeply affected by a simple comment on Saidit.

      And I still don't understand your obsession with faggots, or faggotry, whatever that is. Why focus on this?

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]Bigs 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

        Are you OK? Or just some shill?

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        Don't worry about me. You got something relevant to say? Do you wish to argue that Project Veritas and OANN aren't shills? If so, how would you know?

        [–]Bigs 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

        What do you think Veritas is shilling for?

        They're just exposing the reality

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        Because you say so? Because they say so? You do realize that they constructed a misleading narrative for their story, right?

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        [removed]

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          Of course there are serious ethical problems at FB (and many other companies).

          That's not at issue in this thread of for this post.

          The issue is "meddling with election" which cannot be proven as a specific FB initiative, any more than CNN, Twitter, FB and other companies actively helped elect Trump by giving him so much attention.

          In hindsite, these companies can look back at their practices and see how the social media worked. To say that they planned the whole process is another matter. Remember that Cambridge Analytica manipulated FB and other sites in order to elect Trump. Thus both FB and Cambridge Analytica 'meddled in that election'.

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [removed]

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            on it...