The Decay of Knowledge by RupertTaylor493 in sciences

[–]RupertTaylor493[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent points Uncle Willard. I think I'm going to have to rework the title. Knowledge doesn't decay, except in those who hew to certain ideologies, it changes and improves.

Anyway, thanks for your thoughtful comments.

The Decay of Knowledge by RupertTaylor493 in sciences

[–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is it a half-life or just the stepping stone to better understanding. In all examples, more research improved our knowledge and we just jettisoned the old, inaccurate conclusions. That's science in a nutshell and why rational people gravitate to it; it can be updated with new information unlike religion or politics, etc.

In today's post-fact age, though, some of this knowledge is being displaced due to the current narrative. Biological sex, for example, is practically worthy of burning at the stake, if brought up in the wrong company. And there's also a narrative that says things like science, math, history, the English language - all are being thrown out simply because of the race of the people who developed them. Even years ago, in a college English Lit class, a black kid argued that any word definition was inherently flawed because white people wrote the dictionary. That was laughable then, but it's de rigueur now.

How long before we start losing knowledge due to presentism?

The Decay of Knowledge by RupertTaylor493 in sciences

[–]RupertTaylor493[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks

The Decay of Knowledge by RupertTaylor493 in sciences

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good stuff. Posts like this are why I continue to give this site a chance.

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]JustLookDontDismiss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was not my wording though entirely that came from a attorney out of the UK that claimed that

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]Antarchomachus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes you are correct that they did not have an isolated virus, the document says that. Yes the PCR test was hysterically inaccurate. But you are making unsupported claims about 'testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA'. Neither item you linked me to provides evidence for anything of the sort.

When you don't get ALL the facts right, and add your own unsupported speculation, you have less credibility, and subject all of us to claims of misinformation and conspiracy theory

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]JustLookDontDismiss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://davebegleypoet.wordpress.com/2021/08/08/fda-document-admits-covid-pcr-test-was-developed-without-isolated-covid-samples-for-test-calibration-effectively-admitting-its-testing-something-else/

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]JustLookDontDismiss[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Actually I wouldn't doubt that one America News Network has probably broken the story I would imagine. Oan is one of the last news networks that are legitimate news. This is why you cannot find them on Comcast I think you can only find them on DirecTV and their website

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]JustLookDontDismiss[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because this gets censored I was banned from nextdoor.com for posting this exact article this document from the FDA themselves. The system is pushing forth on agenda even though the information is out there that completely shows that all this s*** is complete bs big tech Censors and hides it.

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]Antarchomachus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because while that link is legit, that is not at all what the FDA paper says. It says they didn't yet have a live covid sample, so they used the genetic sequence in the database. It doesn't say shit about the flu

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]Antarchomachus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thats not what it says at all. It says they had no covid sample, so they used the sequence in the database that the chinese gave us. It was not testing for the common flu, although weve seen from the CDC that the flu could result in false positives as well

This FDA document proves that the PCR test was testing for the common flu mixed with human DNA. I believe the page that you want to see is page 40. Performance characteristics. This was technically made public August 21st 2021 by JustLookDontDismiss in sciences

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So? If this info is so hot then why hasn't a cub reporter broken the story and busted this bullshit wide open?