all 4 comments

[–]HiddenFox 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Justin never earned his place in life or politics.

Back around the 2010's the liberals were a third rate party. They weren't even official opposition in parliament. They couldn't beat Harper and the conservatives so they came up with the plan to put Justin forward as party leader hoping to run on his father's namesake.

If he was named Justin Smith instead of Justin Trudeau the man would have been lucky to win a seat in parliament let alone make it to PM of Canada.

Trump sees this. He sees a boy who lived off daddy's trust fund and name and never had to earn his place. Trump knows who Justin is and he mocks him for it to knock Justin down a peg. I'm sure Trump is dealt many phony and entitled people before knowing the way to bring these people down to reality is with a little public humiliation.

I wonder how many leaders truly respect Justin. I imagine when he's at some world leader conference everyone there will show him respect because he is a prime minister of a country after all. It's what they say behind closed doors that I'm really curious about. I doubt anyone is saying "wow there's a true leader!"

I think Justin is naive enough to believe that the respect he gets is sincere. Truth is without his namesake you would have just been another fellow.

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I respected Trump as a politician, but I was neutral about him as a man until this headline.

[–]ZephirAWT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Donald Trump is trying to 'humiliate' Justin Trudeau with Canada jokes, ex-Trump adviser says Progressivist mafia of globalists like Klaus Schwab isn't very different from mafia of conservative globalists like Elon Musk and they even converge to similar dystopian technologies (carbon or trade taxes, brain implants, digital Ids and human clones, mandatory GMO's and vaccinations and so on). It's just that the former group relies more on collectivist obedience, whereas the later on individualist one. This is like to decide which concentration camps were better for their involuntary occupants: those of Hitler or those of Stalin?

[–]ZephirAWT 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A scientist stood up at a conference and said 'My research shows all blue-eyed people are more intelligent than the rest'. So all the blue eyes people stood up and applauded, and the others slunk down in their seats. The next speaker said 'My research shows that blue eyed people are less inteligent than all the rest'. And it was the blue-eyed people who then slunk down in their seats and shut their eyes. A third scientist stood up and said 'My research proves that this audience is dumber than the average."