you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]sproketboy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Fine. But you're not addressing the underlying issue the author discusses.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What do you think I did not address? I am directly rejecting their rejection of classification and their elitist sense of morality driving it. I couldn't care less what anthropologists incorrectly think. A morphological correlation to ancestry is biology. That 80 or 90% of a bunch of educated ignorant pearl clutchers think otherwise is not an "underlying issue".

[–]sproketboy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Look I get it that we got the enlightenment and we also got eugenics from people like you. It's always a trade-off.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The fuck does this have to do with eugenics? Did I even imply it? You don't actually seem to be reading what I write, you're just poisoning the well.