you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]goonmessiah 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (25 children)

This is coming up so the dems have something to help them win in the mid term elections. Could also be to eliminate the “my body, my choice” so the unvaxxed people can be forcefully jabbed, probably at gun point and held down by multiple medical police.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

Biden’s views on abortion rights have shifted since then [1974]. In 2007, for example, Biden was given a 0% score by the (pro-life) National Right to Life Committee and a 75% score by the NARAL Pro-Choice America. “I accept church rule personally, but not in public life,” he said in October 2012. On 25 April 2019, the anti-abortion Life Site News website announced Biden’s candidacy this way: “Pro-abortion Joe Biden announces entry into 2020 presidential race.”

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-biden-roe-v-wade-quote/

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Always defending the powerful, this account.

The source is the New York Times. https://archive.md/Z2otW

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Noting the facts is not defending anyone. You should know the facts. Stop defending idiots who post misleading Tweets. And to say that Biden is the actual power behind anything is - you have to admit - really dumb.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Noting the facts is not defending anyone.

Joe Biden is being defended. This is wrong and bad. "FYI it’s not okay to be a grown adult at the end of the year 2021 and still believe Joe Biden is a good president." -- Caitlyn Johnstone

You should know the facts.

The facts are that Joe Biden said this, and the New York Times reported it. Are you doubting the New York Times' truth-telling ability?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

well the ny times did lie about iraq WMDs

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They reported the evaluation of the intelligence community. The New York Times would never lie.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

nah they did lie, and this was the beginning of people not trusting the MSM anymore

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

FFS - he said it in 1974, and has said many things in the past few decades, many of which show that he's not exactly the same now as he was in 1974. Regardless of whether he believes or doesn't believe in the comment taken out of the 1974 context, you should not try to be dishonest about a quotation that's decades old. Instead, say that he said it in 1974. It's really simple. Try to be honest, Chipit.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Defending Biden again. Extremely sus. Extremely.

Since when do politicians get a break from saying things? Biden is Catholic, this is how Catholics think. He's lying. And you're helping him lie. Doesn't that feel dirty?

Go check the want ads. There are better jobs out there than this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No - Chipit - I'm just pointing out that comments made 47 years ago, and approaches since then, are important to put into context. Much of the disinformation on Saidit is based on information taken out of its original condext. This is not related to Biden, but to the foolishness of people posting and upvoting lies. I would also point this out if it happened to a Trump comment about 'grab them by the pussy' or whatever. Indeed, Trump is the perfect gentleman today, and would never grab someone by the pussy.

[–]goonmessiah 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

How is this relevant? Anyone that pays attention to politicians is already aware of this. Are you sharing it for those that aren’t aware or are you attempting to make some vague point?

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

People post snopes links to prove they're leftist shills. That dude and his prostitute gf are paid whores.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Enough with the name-calling, Node (and I cannot return the favor or I'd get "a strike" from d3rr). If you don't have an argument or evidence, posting insults will merely show that you've not bothered to think about or understand the discussion. Regarding Snopes, consider their evidence on a case-by-case basis, and if you wish, respond to that evidence.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

It says why it's relevant.

[–]goonmessiah 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

It really doesn’t.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Is history unimportant to you?

[–]goonmessiah 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

This particular persons history, no. He’s not even self aware, so what people are saying is bullshit. It’s all political moves and countermoves.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The person is unimportant.

At issue: the Roe v. Wade comment in 1974 and how that approach changed over time, and how Roe v Wade is now another political football

[–]goonmessiah 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Now you’re just twisting words around to seem like you’re making a point, but you’re just saying the same shit I’ve already said.

[–]grassfed 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Its a shill

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Look, Goo Messiah: you responded to my post about, "Biden’s views on abortion rights have shifted since then [1974]" by asking, "how is this relevant?" Then you responded to , "is history unimportant to you?" with "this particular persons history, no." To this I responded with a comment that's similar to, "views on abortion rights have shifted since then [1974]." Do you see what's relevant here? We now have a much better understanding - as does Biden - about the importance of Roe v Wade than we did in 1974. The OP's comment is taken way out of context. Get it? Now - in order to get a few votes from "Christian" knuckle draggers (not the actual Christians), right-wing asshats have now packed the Supreme Court with political hacks who have no concept of basic ethics so that they can overturn Roe v Wade. See why this statement by the OP is popular among the American Taliban? Now be a good Goo Messiah and ask women what they think of abortion laws.