you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Friedman was a fraud, a genius yes, but still a fraud. He was an undercover Postmodernist. He made Libertarianism the topological anti-type of Liberalism and Individualism, which facilitated the highjacking of the 1970's Neo-Liberal movement in order to expand Pax Americana to include the Gulf states. In Europe this meant subversion of central bank orthodoxy in a similar way to Japan and Germany under the Marshall plan. And in Britain it meant shutting down hundreds of small circulation newspapers. Not very Libertarian. Friedman's on my list of Nobel price winners that should have their awards revoked, as well as Obama and Kissinger.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      He logically argued against Keynesian economics...

      Did he? Keynesianism resurfaced in 2008 because excluding banks and money from economic models produces a nonsense view of the economy.

      Did you know that The Bank of England didn't know how to create new money during the 2008 financial crisis? They had to dig through dusty old books in storage to find out. That was the result of people like Friedman 'burying' Keynesian economics.

      There's a famous video clip of Friedman arguing about cheaper prices. The thing is, wages are prices and no one likes cheaper wages.

      As for unintended consequences being the cause for most government failures I only partially agree. The cross over between government and private interests seems to be the epicentre of most failures, especially when they decide they've defeated the business cycle once again.

      Edit: typo

      [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Classical economics.