"The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media" William Colby, Director of CIA 1973-1976

submitted by EndlessSunflowers from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

the oss, which was the precursor to the cia was created by the papal knight of malta donovan.. the knights of malta were subdued by napoleon, the illuminati puppet, therefore the cia is an illuminati (communist) org.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Really? Always with the commies.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

it's because they are still refusing to go away :-)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I buy everything in that statement, up to the (communist) thing. They are above the communist/capitalist intentionally divisive issue. You know this, yet you pick a side/tribe/dogma. Curious.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

i could use satanists instead,. i still stick with communism because people know that communism exist politically, but i am not sure if many realize satanism exist politically. i mean it's much easier for me to say communists than to say satanists and then explain how satanists created communism through the illuminati every time.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Why not "the Ruling Class"? That covers all of "them" and (((them))) and ٭ŦɧΞӜ٭.

People don't know commies for shit. They don't even know how their own political heroes and celebrity propagandists are fucking them over and exploiting them at every opportunity.

It also makes you seem like you more than just lean right. Maybe you do. That's fine. But generally the opposite of a communist is a capitalist. While I appreciate aspects of capitalism, I would rather be free of it.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

it's not specific enough / too open for interpretation.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How about "The Evil Ruling Class"? Kakistocracy? Corrupt Elites? Establishment Of Eugenicists?

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

better!! :-) thanks! i do use these along with "the powers that shouldn't be", scum, "inbred imbeciles", templar-nazis, etc

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Templar-Nazis is good. Corrupt Inbred Elites! They aren't as imbecilic as they'd want us to believe.

" Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor gets them off the hook faaaaar too often.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

i think capitalism is not a result of a satanist conspiracy, so i am not treating it equally with communism. i don't visualise a ying/yang sign when i think of them for example.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Maybe you should?

It's easy to over simplify such a broad matter, but IMO, this is what it boils down to in the harshest dogmatic terms...

Capitalism = self = get what I can for me and mine. Easily corrupted by authority into free exploitationism with many casualties scraping by.

Communism = tribe = share among your community to raise all boats. Easily corrupted by authority determining who gets or doesn't with many casualties scraping by.

Ultimately it seems that the ruling class is equally weaponizing self and tribe interests against each other - as well as on national levels.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

you are confusing communism with nationalism

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

All nations have elements of socialism/communism embedded in them. There is no US military without the forced socialism of the state stealing your taxes to pay for it. Corrupted as fuck so instead of socialism I'd call it communism.

IMO:
Communism = us helping us via state control and distribution.
Nationalism = us vs others, keeping us pure, strong, unified, homogeneous, status quo, etc.

How would you distinguish them?

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

i think you are mixing apples and oranges.

nationalism can be democratic, communism can't be,

nationalism allows private property, communism doesn't,

nationalism allows free (free as in free speech, not as in free beer) education, communism doesn't,

etc

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What makes you think communism can't be democratic? That's absurd, though it's as much of a show as here. Putin and his leaders and teamsters has rigged the game for a while. So too the Bush's and the Clintons. It's an illusion of choice. Voting is a rigged joke!

There's a profound distinction between private and personal, FYI. Nonetheless, Russia is balls deep in oligarchs with an excess of private property, not all but much of it stolen with the "fall of the wall" - just like the USA. China has more billionaires than anywhere else in the world.

I don't know where you're getting all this nationalism privilege from. Socialism and communism is all about free education. Cuba has some of the best free medical education in the world - but due to the sanctions they didn't have supplies, ironically. Many countries would send their best to Cuba - for free.

Seriously, this is common knowledge. Ask anyone. Look it up.