you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Then, as you said, that's not just an "insurrection", that's a movement.

We need a new clear manifesto / charter / constitution that starts over with unmistakable goals and terms that folks can rally behind, support, and push into action.

[–]William_World 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

good point

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

tho it's best to keep things secret until time to take action. Can't have anything online, only talk thru face to face, even then who knows if you're talking to a fed.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

False. Secrecy is the problem. Open crowdsourced transparency is the only way to be legitimate with nothing to hide and so that everyone can find weaknesses, strengthen, support, and rally behind solutions - regardless of the evil interests and their propaganda. Ideas are more powerful than flawed and mortal individuals.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

it's understandable why some on this public website won't like secrecy. But we can't talk about what really needs to be done here for obvious reasons. The rich understand this and use secret societies to plan and implement their plans. All thru history all the good people that try to organize things publicly get assassinated. And it's very difficult in this age of technology with mass surveillance.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Those excuses don't fly.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nevertheless