Back in December 2020, NPR tried to debunk the lab leak hypothesis. I immediately suspected this was a false claim. How did I know? My first heuristic for spotting propaganda: Anytime I see a quote that uses the phrases "zero evidence", ‘“scientists say,” and “baseless,” I know it's propaganda.

submitted by Chipit from treeofwoe.substack.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]agelmat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's enough evidence to show that there was a ton of foresight, planning and foreknowledge of COVID-19 (pretty much all from US factions)

Because a Corana virus epidemic was expected since 2001. Corona viruses were being closely monitored since the Star's outbreak in the 2000's. They evolve quickly and can be dangerous to humans when they do. Thus most organisations in the world were expecting an outbreak especially from China. They just didn't expect it from Wuhan because Wuhan is outside the areas where bats live. Whether this means that the virus is due to an accident from a lab or naturally occurring due to the wild animal markets hasn't been proven either way. Even Wimbledon had insurance in the event of a coronavirus outbreak.

Isn't convenient that it was spread in a wet market and that MSM initially all pointed to the bat theory and that pictures of Asians eating bats were spread all over social media?

Because gooks aka Asians do eat bats. The Ebola virus came from Africans eating bats. Same thing can happen. Doesn't mean it came from a bat, but there is no evidence either for a lab leak or a natural source. But the Chinese acted suspiciously.

how did they know it would go from 7 cases to a global pandemic

Because everyone with knowledge of viruses knows that corona viruses are dangerous and outbreak is dangerous. You might not know this but many big media houses have people with medical and research knowledge on their teams.