Of course Democrats change meanings. They do so all the time in order to win arguments. I am using the literal legal term, not some random dictionary definition that got changed yesterday. Your assumption that I support anything the racial facade that the violent communists have done is false, as is your apparent delusion that I am a democrat. You should stop attacking people and start looking at their arguments. These two things are not the same, and the author of this piece is either misinformed or illogical himself, as he seems to think Floyd was killed by the police.

Whether Babbit was protesting is irrelevant to what she did later, just as if the BLM communists were protesting is irrelevant once they started destroying any property or attacking people. She made a decision to attempt to enter a place where she was not wanted, and suffered from what I believe to be an overreaction. That does not change that she tried to enter the place, which is defined as trespassing. Floyd had a habit of eating his drugs in order to hide them from the police, and his end should have easily been foreseen by himself and likely the police detaining him. The only way these were similar is that both involved a lack of foresight on the part of the deceased, but I believe that taking enough drugs to overdose and trying to get access to a guarded area to be quite different.