Systemic Anti-White Bias in Western Media: A ton of evidence

submitted by [deleted] from (thuletide.wordpress.com)

all 62 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (39 children)

Even this counter-reaction is itself a form of intended propaganda. This is divide-and-conquer in action. To make white people feel victimized and attacked, so that they might lash out.

Don't fall for the attack, or the counter-attack. It's a trick. This is not what life is about.

[–]VirgilGriff 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

"We can attack you, and if you defend against it you're making the attack worse."

The first part to fixing a problem is to notice the problem and discuss it.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (6 children)

My point is that the problem is manufactured and the problem isn't really real in the first place, and "fighting" it only gives it more energy, which is the intended effect. That's how divide-and-conquer works

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The problem might be manufactured, but it's real. The statistics are real. Our people are suffering, our lands are being taken from us. Your solution to not fight back is cowardly at best, traitorous at worst.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone is suffering, the problem is they make you think "our people" are whites, instead of "our people" being everyone who isn't a billionaire (which is closer to the truth of who is being actually affected).

Thinking the divides are along race and gender, rather than who has the most money, is just a divide and conquer technique and it's best we not fall for it.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't like billionaires either, to be sure, but take billionaires out of the picture and the reality that the races, some more than others, are incompatible remains.

The fact that blacks rape 30,000+ white women and children in the US every year, and in the same timeframe whites rape 0 or close to 0 blacks, that isn't billionaire's doing, it's the blacks themselves who bring this violence and dysfunction to a formerly peaceful and prosperous civilization. I don't support genocide but it's clear that black people need their own spaces, far away from whites, for the benefit of everyone involved.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your people who?

[–]VirgilGriff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How can one differentiate between an actual problem that's sowing discord (which implies it's worth fighting) and a manufactured one that's sowing discord (which implies that giving it attention makes it worse, and ignoring it may or may not make it better)?

It seems to me that much of this is a natural manifestation of years of SJW shit being pushed in multiple public spheres, and most recently is reflected by one of the two political parties buying into it hard. The only defense I've seen that's effective is to:

  1. Be able to speak freely about the problem (largely why I'm on Saidit and not Reddit right now, as it's impossible to have conversations on the latter)

  2. Discuss and spread the merits of individualism over collectivism, and especially to criticize neo-Marxism/cultural Marxism/any collectivist identity-based social theory.

Marxism is itself a bifurcated ideology, design to divide and conquer. Cultural Marxism is the best way to describe what's currently happening, I believe, where the proletariat and bourgeoisie are replaced by infinitely fractional "intersectional" subgroups, whose borders can be continually shifted so as to maximize the length of time it takes for people to lift the veil on the victim-based lie that they're being sold.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How can one differentiate between an actual problem that's sowing discord (which implies it's worth fighting) and a manufactured one that's sowing discord (which implies that giving it attention makes it worse, and ignoring it may or may not make it better)?

That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? If it were easy to distinguish the two, they wouldn't do it at all. That's kind of the whole trick in a nutshell. Strong logic is important, but so is knowing when someone is yanking your chain and having the ability to walk away.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

How about this... boycott all corporations that show anti-caucasian bias. Stop paying taxes that goes to war ammunitions and stop voting for Zionists. Imagine if everyone just boycotted these criminals? Boycotting criminality ahould be the goal and awareness.

You might want to close doen your bank account while your at it too. They are funding anti-caucasian movements as well.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Not to toss a wrench in your reasoning, but genetically speaking, Semites are Caucasian. If you choose to look at race that way, Zionists are just members of your tribe that have decided that you are too mixed/distantly related to be one of them. You're not so much a noble band of Caucasians resisting the evil Zionists, you are a jealous kid brother pecking at the coattails of your distant, dismissive sibling.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Stupid reasoning. Why add jealousy into all of this? That is what many Zionists do!

Ashkenazi Jews, the majority of them in the US who control much of the government are ASIATIC. They are not Caucasian; nor are they semitic.

Zionists can be of any race, even shabbos goys like Biden can be Zionists and admit that they are.

The point is Zionists follow the Synagogue of Satan which rejects Christ, YESHUA.

Lastly, Zionism IS A POLITICAL ISM. It is an ideology. Caucasians, Asiactics have all kinds of conflicting ideologies. What Zionists are is a cult, one that holds unto their Jewishness in "Christianity" like Michael Brown, who loves Trump, or is covertly an ethno-nationalist.

Zionism is one of terrorim. That is why they had to use Darby, Scofield as liasons to push Zionism unto meek Christians. It was always a terrorist project, against not only Palestinians but diaspora Jews" as well.

All reject Christ. All have the ability to follow him; they refuse.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Stupid reasoning. I cannot add anything that you already exhibit in abundance; it is already there. I can only point out its existence.

There is no race called "Asiatic." This term was invented specifically to ostracize Caucasian peoples who were perceived as inimical to or inferior to the largely Anglo-Saxon people who sought to distinguish themselves from other Caucasian groups. Actually, your argument is drawn directly from British physician William Lawrence, who likewise confabulated the Fins and Laplanders right out of the Caucasian category, handwaving them away without evidence as 'Asiatics' and subsequently corrected by Thomas Huxley. The exact same material you are citing was subsequently invoked by German eugenicists. You are cherrypicking a specific moment in racialist history that was rapidly debunked by other racialists. Modern genetic analyses, for what they are worth, establish the majority of what we call 'Jewish people' today as firmly Caucasian. This is a scientific reality. If you are a Caucasian, you are in the same racial group as the vast and overwhelming majority of Jewish people, albeit probably much more mixed than they are. I do have a brother so I know how vitriolic these sibling rivalries can be; as they say, "familiarity breeds contempt." It is your close familial link that has you so at odds with one another.

Semites, like the other peoples of the Mesopotamian region, are Caucasioid. In fact, 'Semite' refers to a linguistic group, not a genetic lineage. Semites are functionally indistinguishable from the other Caucasians of the region. 'Semite' is an academic term with a specific usage, and you have deviated from that usage here.

There is neither a Satan nor a Christ so I'll let you say whatever you like about that. I prefer to focus on the genetics. The fact remains that you cannot point to any genetic lineage or race and conflate them with Zionism or Semitism, without pointing to a Caucasian people. Your best fallback here is to run with the argument that Zionism is more of a philosophy with no genetic lineage behind it, you will get further with that. Honestly, your main mistake was invoking the 'Caucasian' category at all. There was never any chance you were going to win with that, not without throwing away the whole of modern ancestral analyses in favor of 1800s armchair racialism. Not even the neo-Nazis would have your back on this one.

I'm sure it was a fiery and passionate sermon that you got your information from, certainly something to behold. I am quite sympathetic to this, part of my job involves travelling around the world studying different religions. But parroting a sermon is not the same as hitting the books and having your facts straight.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Semitic: ie. denoting a language of Hebrew and Arabic among other languages.

Zionism is what? Zionism denotes a land for Jews that was "occupied" by indigenous Palestinians. Zealotry under Rome by biblical Jews and high preists also used Zionist tendencies, such that "this is our land and our God, he has thus chosen us, and not you, to take land for ourselves."

This is a scientific reality. If you are a Caucasian, you are in the same racial group as the vast and overwhelming majority of Jewish people, albeit probably much more mixed than they are.

Very true, though, intermixture did occur. And the Asiatic race does exist.

Zionism can be thus criticised, as can Judaism and ethno-nationalism.

Can you provide me with some links debunking the Ashkenazi Khazar theory as well as the Asiactic race theory?

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That'd be great. But the first step to doing all that is to discuss it

[–]Ethnocrat 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

So we should just let them attack us?

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Yeah, Magnora thinks it's a "divide and conquer" stategy but that's a retarded take. It's being implemented by people who have already conquered and whose power is global and unassailable. They have an ethnic grudge against Europeans and those of European descent, and they want us to be hated, persecuted minorities in our own ancestral lands. If we don't fight back they will win. Which is why I say people like Magnora7 are either cowards or traitors.

[–]littleboyblue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

this is precisely why the BLM movement will see victory over whites, because all of you are at odds with each other.. islam is at the core of this movement, and non-muslims can not see the wave that is coming.. a neighbor of mine thinks that islam will ease up in a couple of generations, when they figure out that nonmuslims really do like to eat pork..

white people are soon to be the least supreme beings on earth.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

This has nothing to do with supremacy. It's about preserving our people and our homelands from destruction at the hands of hostile invaders and the unelected oligarchs, billionaires and NGO's that shuttle them into our borders. Muslims and blacks are just truncheons that Jews and their global finance use to bludgeon Europeans.

[–]littleboyblue 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's about preserving our people and our homelands from destruction at the hands of hostile invaders

technically, wasnt the white man the original hostile invader of the united states?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Dunno, I'm talking about Europe. But what happened to the native Americans was tragic, I don't support colonialism and never have. The United States is lost in any case, whites are doomed to become a persecuted minority there. What's important now is preserving the mother continent where thousands of generations of our ancestors have lived and died and fought to create a future for us, their descendants.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sorry, Zionists already do that.

    [–]Ethnocrat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    islam is at the core of this movement

    What?

    [–]littleboyblue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC2VQjSgpso

    [–]Ethnocrat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    What's that supposed to prove?

    [–]littleboyblue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    i am not trying to prove anything to you.

    [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Who is 'us'?

    [–]Ethnocrat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    White people.

    [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    That's a pretty disparate 'us.' White people are not even close to a cohesive racial category. You've got Teutons, Nords, Anglo-Saxons, Sarmatians, Phrygians, Fins, Laplanders... Maybe there was a time when 'white people' was anything other than the call of a mutt longing for a real racial identity, but that isn't true of white Americans. You're like me. I'm mixed from all over the world. I know what a raceless people looks like, and it looks like you and I. The difference is that I'm not even in a position to pretend otherwise, but you are.

    Shall we discuss genetics? I love talking about genetics!

    [–]Ethnocrat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You're like me.

    I'm not American, so no, I'm not. And mixed white is still white. I was talking about race, not ethnicity. White Americans are not raceless, quite the contrary.

    [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Are you white? If so, then by your own reasoning, yes, we very much are indeed siblings. I am 35% white, by mixture, on my mother's side. She is so fair-skinned, you might think she's some kind of elf. You said it yourself--mixed white is STILL white. We are indeed siblings. Hello, my white brother (or sister)!

    White Americans are largely raceless. Like me! I can still point to the larger portions of my admixture, like my white component, and claim membership in that group. It may be a largely fictional membership, but we have that much in common. White Americans can be fit very loosely into the Caucasian category, along with Middle-Eastern/Mediterranian folk and North Indians. This used to be a pretty hot topic back in the day, with cases like In re Ah Yup (1878) in which Judge Lorenzo Saywer said, "white person... a very indefinite description of a class of persons, where none can be said to be literally white... one would scarcely fail to understand that the party employing the words 'white person' would intend a person of the Caucasian race."

    Actually, almost all of my admixture is Caucasian, from nearly every example of the term, even though my skin is not at all white. I'm probably more Caucasian than you are. White Americans are a hodgepodge of highly diverse Caucasian groups who can scarcely identify which of the many white races they are actually comprised of. Ironically, Jews tend to be the less mixed Caucasian elements, which suggests why mongrel ethnonationalist Americans tend to have such a problem with them.

    [–]Ethnocrat 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Are you white?

    Yes.

    mixed white is STILL white.

    I meant whites mixing with other whites. As in Russians mixing with Germans for example.

    We are indeed siblings.

    So your genetic ancestry is European?

    White Americans are largely raceless.

    No, they're not. The overwhelming majority of white Americans are not mixed with other races. Their genetic ancestry is almost entirely European.

    White Americans can be fit very loosely into the Caucasian category, along with Middle-Eastern/Mediterranian folk and North Indians.

    That's a categorization based on skull shapes, I'm talking about genetics. Whites are Europeans.

    I'm probably more Caucasian than you are.

    I doubt that, but you're not more European than me.

    White Americans are a hodgepodge of highly diverse Caucasian groups who can scarcely identify which of the many white races they are actually comprised of.

    Again, this is nonsense. White Americans are overwhelmingly European.

    Jews tend to be the less mixed Caucasian elements, which suggests why mongrel ethnonationalist Americans tend to have such a problem with them.

    First of all, Jews are less European than white Americans, and secondly, we have problems with them because they're trying to replace us in all our nations. And white Americans are only mongrels in terms of mixed European heritage.

    [–]milkmender11 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So your genetic ancestry is European?

    Yes, but 'European' is not a race. Europeans themselves correctly divided the Caucasian peoples into the many different races that they are: Anglo Saxon, Teuton, Sarmatian, Laplander, Iberian, etc. Melanochroi and Xanthrochroi, 'dark' whites and 'fair' whites. The number of white races is enormous. It was not a cihesive category 300 years ago, it certainly isn't today either.

    No, they're not. The overwhelming majority of white Americans are not mixed with other races. Their genetic ancestry is almost entirely European.

    Yes, white Americans are raceless--or, I should say, they (we) are heavily mixed, among the most racially mixed people im the world. 'White' and 'European' are not races. There are at least a dozen races contained within those categories, and white Americans are mongrel hybrids of those various pure races. '100% European' is like saying '100% medium-size dog.' That isn't a breed, need to be more specific than that.

    That's a categorization based on skull shapes, I'm talking about genetics. Whites are Europeans.

    You are incorrect. That is a categorization based on haplotypes. It has been substantiated with genetic data traced through mitochondrial DNA. I understand that it can be upsetting to realize that your genetic lineage is inexorably tied to Middle Eastern and Indian populations, but it is an inevitability if you go back far enougb anyway. Whites are not Europeans. Whites include Laplanders, Fins, Scythians, even Semites. In fact, Semites are perhaps the most racially pure White race which remains, which explains why the mixed white races are so disdainful of them.

    I doubt that, but you're not more European than me.

    I certainly am. 'European' is a historical and geographic category, not a racial one. In fact, O'Dushlaine et al even published a paper showing how easy it is to racially differentiate the many white races in the 'European' historico-geographic category. 'Europeans' are some of the most genetically mongrel types in the world.

    Again, this is nonsense. White Americans are overwhelmingly European.

    Correction, 'European' is not a racial category.

    First of all, Jews are less European than white Americans, and secondly, we have problems with them because they're trying to replace us in all our nations. And white Americans are only mongrels in terms of mixed European heritage.

    Less European, of course. Less white, no. Whiteness is not equivalent to 'people of European descent.' 'White' refers to Caucasian ancestry, inclusive of the haplotypes that evolved for fair complexion. See the records for In re ah yup in the California Supreme Court, late 1900s. Whiteness has always been hotly contested, but understood to be distinct from 'European.' Semitic Jews are racially pure whites, while Europeans are mixed from many different races.

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Even this counter-reaction is itself a form of intended propaganda.

    I wouldn't call it a counter-reaction. It's a collection of newspaper clippings.

    This is divide-and-conquer in action.

    Exposing the divide and conquer media is divide and conquer?

    To make white people feel victimized and attacked, so that they might lash out.

    Not my intention. "Lashing out" solves nothing.

    Don't fall for the attack, or the counter-attack. It's a trick. This is not what life is about.

    Yes, be wary of tricks.

    [–]Jesus 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Know that Brietbart and Likudniks are top propagandists for the pro-white movement. Remember, Israel is a racist ethnocracy, so it makes sense. It's like someone who talks all the time about leftist Jews and how they all have dual-Israeli citizenship, but then votes for Trump and right-wing Zionists.

    Zionists have hijacked the movement and have reduced it to pro-whiteness. Remember, Zionists are of all races.

    [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Yup, been saying this for awhile now. I notice that a lot of propagandists behond the "pro-white" narrative are Likudniks and Netanyahu and Israel lovers. They seem to only expose leftists.

    To make white people feel victimized and attacked, so that they might lash out.

    Yes, then they can sign laws using that precedent.

    It's like the Gab.ai shooting. They usually use psyops to get the job done but maybe they want some real action to seal the deal.

    [–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    This is one of those thing which just a year ago most people would have said was nonsense but now we've all seen it with our own eyes.

    Of course it's all about hurting the poor and middle class. Rich white people actually benefit from this stuff which is why they promote it. https://psmag.com/news/talking-about-white-privilege-can-reduce-liberal-sympathy-for-poor-white-people

    [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Aren't you a zionist?

    [–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    I believe Israel should exist, yes.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    That's not what I said. Zionism is one of terrorism. A one state solution is the only answer, not a "Jewish" ethnocracy. "Jews" are free to live anywhere in the west mind you.

    [–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Nope. You need to look up that word you use so much.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    A Zionist is synonymous with an extremist, a radical. They are no different than a KKK member who believes "white people" are the "superior race" and every other race are sub-humans, animals, just bringing their country down when "we could all be so much better if whites ruled everything" (just replace white people/whites, with Jews, and KKK member with Zionist, and you have what a Zionist believes in).

    That's the same exact mindset with Zionism, except applied to an elite class of (self-proclaimed) Jews. Zionism is a form of extremism. There are extremists in every group; it would be naive to think there aren't extremists among Jews. There are a good number of people in Israel who are Jewish, know what Zionism is and protest it; you can find this with a simple google (or youtube) search. Zionists hold extremists beliefs and there's a reason even Jewish citizens of Israel are against them.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Zionism is one of terrorism. Herzl's Zionism is political Zionism. It was always Zealotry against Palestinians and Diaspora Jews.

    For instance: https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/6o0l/politics_of_certain_zionist_jews_vs_antizionist/

    [–]boeing737 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Ew

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Mirror http://archive.is/JCuOY

    All images available here: https://imgur.com/a/ArWRH5W

    and here: https://mega.nz/folder/dYRnFSxY#WFBnjZph2mbs5NoscWEczg

    PDF https://files.catbox.moe/99d8zm.pdf

    Thanks to /u/Jesus-Christ for letting me know the last imgur collection I linked like this was scrubbed from existence. Get it while you still can!

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Looks like your thread attracted attention and is under attack.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This is a great compilation, ty!

    [–]AwakenGoyimEcoSlaves 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    gee i wonder (((who))) would ever see whites as a threat

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [removed]

      [–]AwakenGoyimEcoSlaves 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Being white has nothing to do with you having shitty parents and you being racist trash. The exact same thing happens in black families.

      [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Being 'white' is a sad circumstance. I should know, I'm part Latino, part South Asian, part African, part Native, and part European. I'm a mutt with no home, just like you. Scandanavians and Semites, I suppose they are the closest things to 'white races' that still exists. The rest of you are just genetic hodgepodges like me, just as mixed but amongst a gallimaufry of disparate Caucasioid peoples. Your anger and dissillusionment is all to familiar to me, but unlike you, I know there is no racial camaraderie to be had with people as scattered and diverse as you. Teutons and Fins, Laplanders and Sarmatians, Persians and Anglo-Saxons?? You're more mixed than I am! Tough luck being a mongrel, man. But we aren't alone. I'm more your brother than most white people you see, probably 🤣

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Fuck off kike.

      [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Follow the money. It isn't the low hanging fruit that is the problem.

      [–]Jesus-Christ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Thank you for taking the time to do this, I really appreciate it!

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Just for the record, this isn't my compilation.

      [–]beethy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Solid collection. Thanks for doing this.

      [–]spze 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      There might be other variables at play.. See the movie 'network'.. Also, demographics, probably stats (neilsen something). Has not 'fake' news always been around. What color is it.
      Oh, interesting to hear/read definitions.

      “yellow journalism”

      The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above. not at merriamwebster

      but Definition of gonzo journalism

      chiefly US, informal : journalism that treats a subject in a very personal, unusual, and often shocking way