you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]newguy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lol and of all the inaccuracies in all history shows, you pick race to focus on, of course

I notice you focus on that an awful lot

[–]useless_aether[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

so?

[–]newguy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It just shows you're obsessed with skin color, which is a childish thing to be obsessed about when there are so many other problems in this world, and skin color is very clearly used to divide-and-conquer people. You're reinforcing the divide-and-conquer that you ironically think you're resolving.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree somewhat. Skin color is one dividing factor in the elitist playbook, albeit constraints within a single class is just as tantalizing and effective for them. An example would be the middle class worker against the dispossessed, such as a low-payed industry worker versus a dispossessed farmer, in which because he couldn't pay his taxes for his croup season was poor, the creditor deprived him of hos livelihood. In the US it seems these people are often scorned at by workers within the same class, possibly instigated by a hidden hand.