all 21 comments

[–]fruitjack 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

oh my gosh is that the OP crawled into the fetal position because the lady WASN"T WHITE?????????????????????????????????? what a bunch of mother fucking snowflakes

[–]Penelope 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

By your standards, would it be ok to do a movie about MalcolmX or MLKing and cast him as Korean or White? Also, flimsy ridicule tactic.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Mlk as an Eskimo would be rad.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, not flimsy at all. You guys are a bunch of snow-flakes that are butt-hurt to the changing context of things.

Also having a caucasian MLK or Malcolm X would be cool! but incorrect right now because, they were actually fighting against white supremacy embedded within the fabric of an entire society, rendering others as less than humans deserving respect. The problem is also that your alt-right side could never appreciate it because you would denounce it as an SJW, white-woke brigade tactic even though it could be poignant and creative from many angles.

And before you can even get to that meta, you first have to physically address the political maliciousness behind racism and institutionalized forces that enabled it- which sorta moves against your credentials as the alt-right, since it what you are fighting for to bring back.

The real issue with hate is also in real life, not just in media. so please keep crying your tears and REEEEE it up with your hatred! You deflections will always be superficial.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

cultural marxist detected

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Cultural Marxism is a real systemic problem, but it's the people's fault for allowing themselves to be stupified by it. You don't have to watch these shows, nobody is forcing you to own a televaion and watch propaganda 4 hrs a day. And yet many people do just this.

I don't like the whole purity of blood crap. Real christians denounced such foolishness, Jews promoted it, espeically during their persecution where many were forced to become New christians or Marranos, who then interestingly went onto dominate the slave trade in South America. The papacy was against the inquisition, at least externally, as it was mostly a nationalist fervor and also denounced the slave trade, yet these same Catholics went onto murder heretics. It's funny because at that time, a Marrano Jewish Jesuit, converso (I'll have to find his name, because I have the old book concerning the adventures of the marranos in banking, finance and the slave trade; Cecil Roth also writes a good book on the Marranos) religiously wrote about purity of blood and prasied the Talmud, yet was outwordly a Christian. Another blood purity in the form of a libel was written by the so-called old Christians with the Jesuit movement which sought to prevent conversos. From that time forward is where anti-Semitism and blood purity took a foothold in two extremities both countering each other, even within the same movement.

EDIT: Jews were persecuted in the middle ages. Persecuted to an extent where many were murdered or mutilated by the mob. It's often interesting learnign about this history because at this very point is where the whole blood purity crap came from, and race took a stern stance on Jews and their enemies. In fact, I believe the Friars were one the Jews most hated enemies. But the old Christians took it to themselves to also use the Yahweh like blood purity as a means to kick coversos out of Christianity. Of course there were real coversos that actually turned to Christianity and then fake ones who still practiced their religion, some even secular simply using the society as a means to get privilages which for a long time Jews did not have.

Napolean as a start, did help to give Jews more rights under reformed Judaism than any other leader, but after he died things got bad again for the Jews.

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nobody is forcing me to look at crap, but this will be shown at school to your sons and daughters and they will have no filter to detect crap. It always happened BTW, and our minds are already polluted with BS. Both right and left.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need another Napoleon, for his ideology of the dispossessed farmer or Jackson to set the record straight and end the corportocracy. In the latter case, it took a gritty general to prevent a central bank charter, his death was the start of a new era of the money chargers and creditors who wished to leech off the former sovereigns of the US, now a corporation.

Napoleon states, in his notes and memoirs:

When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.”

This is true, and Napoleon, like Hitler who was most definitely not backed by the Rothschild's or international bankers like his opposition parties were, he even fired the NS Germany Freemason banker which was the final nail in the coffin to destroy Germany (1939: A War That Had Many Fathers; read it) had to get his money to finance the war somewhere. Sanctions and food blockade and geographics did not help in this case, in all cases of war, looting and pillaging countries in which Napoleon and Hitler invaded would suffice, this, ad a sole way to maintain stability during a war or at the very least survive it. Plain and simple, all countries did this. The US government could say fuck right off to these creditors who give themselves jubilees at the expense of the common person like they did in 2008. Catholics, Jews, Atheists, Zionists, it doesn't really matter where creditors come from, but as for Alan Greenspan and the Jewish Ayan Rand Libertarian ideology, yeah that can go screw itself. But we must understand those in government DO NOT represent us, they represent monied interest and are members of a corporation within a star chamber.

Everything else is irrelevant.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alt-right spook detected!

[–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh my gosh is that the OP crawled into the fetal position

citation needed. OP gave an interpretation of an apparent huge historical mistake. Maybe OP is wrong, maybe OP is right. If this is "being a snowflake", it's OK for me. Now I can wear blackface and whoever has something against it is a snow...er...mudflake, right? Hypocrisy is over 9000 in some circles.

[–]newguy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Muh TV races! Clearly so important.

This shit is a distraction from anything important.

[–]useless_aether[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

'The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.' -- George Orwell

[–]newguy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Lol and of all the inaccuracies in all history shows, you pick race to focus on, of course

I notice you focus on that an awful lot

[–]useless_aether[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

so?

[–]newguy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It just shows you're obsessed with skin color, which is a childish thing to be obsessed about when there are so many other problems in this world, and skin color is very clearly used to divide-and-conquer people. You're reinforcing the divide-and-conquer that you ironically think you're resolving.

[–]Penelope 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem obsessed about this.

[–]useless_aether[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

you are right, fighting communism is also a pretty high priority..

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not communism. But elitists in a corportocracy. Besides, Lenin hated the communists and said that the only people he really liked were the capitalists. That's because the entire communist revolution in Russia instigated by the Jew banker Schiff among industrialists and capitalists was to destroy another imperial power and thus use its caricature as a manufacturing hub for cheap labour.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The dude's an ultra-right wing shill. Don't feed someone who can't entertain or teach.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree somewhat. Skin color is one dividing factor in the elitist playbook, albeit constraints within a single class is just as tantalizing and effective for them. An example would be the middle class worker against the dispossessed, such as a low-payed industry worker versus a dispossessed farmer, in which because he couldn't pay his taxes for his croup season was poor, the creditor deprived him of hos livelihood. In the US it seems these people are often scorned at by workers within the same class, possibly instigated by a hidden hand.

[–]the-ham-bummer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you can pick your own aspects to decry and post your own analysis.