you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is nothing haskell-like. First of all, haskell doesn't have comma-parameterized arguments, and secondly, haskell has separate declarations for a function type and the function definition. Sure, haskell-esque syntax is very confusing and a bit high-minded, but this is not remotely similar nor something a haskell dev would suggest at all.

Also, haskell is an awesome language, lol.