use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Links:
Anyone not using Git?
submitted 2 years ago by fschmidt from self.programming
view the rest of the comments →
[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
Do you hate Linux too? Both LInux and Git started by Linus. I hope you're not on Windows if you're afraid of Git, lol.
Your logic doesn't hold. Avoid everything 99% of people are using? Or what is the reasoning here?
[–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
While Git is horrible, Linux is only bad. Linus is a mediocre programmer. (I have reviewed his code.) I use a Mac.
Humanity has recently degenerated into depraved moronic scum, so more than 99% of what they choose to use is bad. I simply want to use good things.
[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Ok, well if you're better than Linus (I guess), it follows you can make something better than Git yourself. If not, then you probably need to appreciate it a bit more, it is a proper VCS. Nothing to say about Github though.
That said, I rarely come across a non-lefty programmer these days. I wish more programmers weren't mindless corporation-worshiping sheep. I miss the days when nerds were the only ones online (before social media basically).
[–]fschmidt[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Of course I am better than Linus, but no need to make something better than Git since Mercurial already exists. And I am involved in other projects that take my time.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]fschmidt[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)