you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cant_even 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm glad this passed. Either this 'law' will be struck down in the near future by the Supremes, or it'll become dead certain that everything it's supposed to be 'defending us from' is in fact a genuine threat.

Enough of this tentative sparring.

[–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The law is not unconstitutional; there is no reason to strike it down.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Accusing someone of something such as a citizen being loyal to Israel is freedom of speech to censor or ban this is unconstitutional.

[–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/672 the law asks the State Department to create a report about anti-demitism in Europe in order to keep track of it. It doesn't ban anything. This screen shot was designed to fool you.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know, I read it, and realized that.