In 1961, a psychologist conducted an experiment demonstrating how ordinary men and women could be induced to inflict torture on complete strangers merely because an authority figure had ordered them to do so. In 2001, the United States government formed the Transportation Security Administration

submitted by Orangutan from corbettreport.com

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

How are these two events related? The TSA is pretty expensive for a "psychological experiment".

Background on the experiment: A scientist wanted to know why Germans had supported the Nazis – what made Germans different? So he devised an experiment where an actor – decided by a loaded short-straw – would sit in a chair behind a wall / glass window (not sure). The participant would read questions, and when the actor got it wrong they were instructed to give the actor an "electric shock" (turning the dial up each time). The actor's reaction started with "ow", proceeded to "aaargh!", then kicking the wall, and then silence. If the participant refused, the person-in-a-white-coat would say something like "please continue", then "the experiment requires that you continue", then "you must continue", and then the experiment was called off.

The scientist tried the experiment in the US as a control (baseline to compare Germans with)… and didn't run the experiment in Germany. Because he didn't need to.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

MASS social experiment. Rather than small isolated test groups. Look into "social engineering", "cultural engineering" (ie. feminism and Laurel Canyon in the 60s), and "manufacturing consent".

If we're willing to let them grab our crotches maybe they'll let them grab other things - our guns, our arms for vaccine shots, our children for their blood, more of our money, etc.

We all seem to be passively allowing the rampant fake war of terror to happen, killing millions and millions.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What makes you think it's an experiment? Maybe a plot to invoke slippery slope, but it would be a shit experiment. No decent control group, for one; I could name many other issues.

our arms for vaccine shots

One of these things is not like the others.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"They" call it the "Great American Experiment".

I didn't say it was a good experiment.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

If this is meant as a conspiracy, the people in charge can't be stupid enough for this to be intended as an actual experiment; they'd learn little from it. The "greed" hypothesis is more plausible than the "experiment" hypothesis.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you kidding?

They get TONNES of vital information back. Who resists who doesn't. Did you even watch the video?

It's a rigged game. There doesn't need to be any "control group" when you're claiming that you're trying to find terrorists.

BILLION$ have been spent on the TSA. How's that for greed? Try being a contractor for that "security" crap. Also, that's part of what the Las Vegas Shooting was about. So when you got to any large event - they'll have security there - for BILLION$ more.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Don't confuse data with information. Data on individuals isn't all that useful from an experimental point of view; that's more under the "surveillance" banner.

Also, what video? I saw an article. Did you even read the article? :-p

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Semantics, however you want to label the lists "they" are making on us.

If you read it you'd have seen " TRANSCRIPT " below the embedded video after the intro paragraph. I don't know what "article" you're talking about.

Like on many of the 9/11 videos with transcripts I've been recommending to you.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Whoops. Never mind. It was a video with a transcript. :-/ I'm an idiot!

By the way, many of the videos you've been recommending are on YouTube, and I try to stay away from that platform.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Corbett Report videos ALL are hosted on his site, and most have transcripts and most are mirrored on BitChute.

I understand avoiding some platforms. I haven't used Facebook this decade, same with Alex Jones. But I won't avoid good information and content based on a platform. I may go to InfoWars and Facebook, or the NYTimes, WashingtonPost, FoxNews, to see something - it doesn't mean I support or endorse them.

If you're lucky, maybe /u/d3rr will mirror and share all those videos on his Peer Tube Memory Hole site: