you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Thank God this guy is able to protect us from the big bad devil called public television. /s

[–]thatrightwinger[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

In spite of your ridiculous sarcasm, you are not able to justify why taxpayer dollars should be used for any television network, much less a highly biased one that clearly hates the taxpayers they're benefiting from.

[–]niggerjewfaggot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

PBS has an EXCELLENT history as an educational network, and one of the few services for which taxes are well spent. The alternative is CORPORATE TV. Go to hell.

[–]pattis 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

PBS is simply a mouthpiece for a bunch of woke tard f** freaks

[–]niggerjewfaggot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

you got that from a PBS documentary?

your head must be so far up Breitbart's ass - you pathetic little simp

[–]pattis 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

》The alternative is CORPORATE TV.

The alternative is the internet.

Television is obsolete.

Taxes should only be used to pay for services that are used by everyone and are required by everyone such as building roads and picking up the trash.

People do not need television to live and they really don't need the internet to live,