He closed the Mueller investigation early.

He released out of context fragments of the report to make it look much less damning than it was.

He redacted large sections of it so that it seemed that there were ongoing investigations.

None of that is true.

The Mueller investigation completed. Barr released the main result. Salty people were upset of the results and upset that Barr gave just the result and didn't spew leading nonsense to muddy the result. Barr didn't even complain when Mueller broke the norm to do just that, squeeze nonsense in their pretending there was possibly obstruction, which helped the media continue to lead the salty people around like a carrot on a stick. He is required to redact names and ongoing investigations. His redactions were extremely minimal and not only done by him.

He pressured Durham to investigate the whistle blowers about the Russia collusion inquiry, and when the only crime they found was by Trump, they hushed it up.

That wasn't hushed up by anyone but the media trying to bury it. At least three people were criminally charged as a result of Durham's investigation, including people (FBI/lawyers) who lied for force the fake Russian collusion political attack Hillary paid millions of dollars for, but wasn't charged for campaign spending violations. Unfortunately, the activist judges let almost everyone off, especially the FBI members, who conspired to push the fake accusations.

I see you're confused about the laws on campaign finance.

I see you are grasping, as I explained that what you said was the nonsense accusation. There's no realistic way to call that campaign spending. They might of paid Cohen to plead guilty on the nonsense charge, but that doesn't work for anyone else.

Paying hush money and killing stories isn't "legal issues". It's "media".

Public figures, with business attached to their names, have many interests in to preventing damages and libel. The real question of this case, has nothing to do with that, thought. It has to prove that monthly payments for legal services to prevent the libel attacks are not a legal retainer and also specifically done for nefarious fraudulent reasons. This is the most extreme stretch possible, which will never be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court, as it primarily relies on mind reading, as like most accusations, it relies squarely on gaslighting you into believing that projected nefarious motivations are unquestionable....it is the same trick over and over again, which shows the extreme bias, corruption, and divergence from norms that these activist courts devolve into when they run a fake circus trial.

In fact no legal service were provided. Cohen was being reimbursed for paying off Daniels, but in monthly payments in an attempt to hide what it was.

Nearly 3 times what the scamming gold digger was paid, was paid to the legal retainer. The legal LLC handled several issues, such as purchasing of rights from enquirer, something one would need a lawyer to handle.

The very extreme stretch of a possible assumption being projected, is grasping at straws in excess of legal norms, even if you ignore that the payments don't add up.