you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent examples

But -

clue #1 is childrenshealthdefense.org and its history of spreading misinformation. Their credibility is nil.

clue #2 The 120 page documents makes numerous claims without noting the evidence for those claims

clue #3 The same document lists previous legal cases, claiming that they relate to the present complaing, but without providing the necessary evidence for those claims

clue #4 There are many claims of activities at Twitter that often have no links to those Twitter events (perhaps the evidence will be in an addendum or appendix that is not in the complaint document)

clue #5 In all of the 470 arguments, there are claims that do not include corroborating information - and instead focus on one claim at a time, without noting the way in which that claim is known

clue #6 The US government has alway engaged with news media and social media in many different ways. Thus there is precedent for government actions to reduce the spread of misinformation.

If this case is rejected (as I think it will), it can be appealed. But there are also federal laws against frivolous lawsuits, which this is.