you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There was an investigation. But the basic physics chain of events was discovered to be:

Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control. These lower-floor fires-which spread and grew because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system for these floors had failed-were similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings. The primary and backup water supply to the sprinkler systems for the lower floors relied on the city's water supply, whose lines were damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2. These uncontrolled lower-floor fires eventually spread to the northeast part of WTC 7, where the building's collapse began.

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

(((Ok)))

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Are you implying with the antisemitic symbol, the triple-brackets, that I'm Jewish, or the investigators?

If you refer to me, this is name-calling. If you refer to the investigators, this is an ad-hominem. In either case they are lower on the pyramid of debate than the comment you're replying to, which links to supporting evidence, and so is counter argument. This is against saidit.net values. I have reported your comment for dragging down the conversation on the pyramid of debate, and encourage you to do better in your future comments.

[–]FreakyFalangistNational Justice Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤓