Fox's Tucker Carlson lamenting that he still to this day cannot mention WTC Tower Number 7 on Fox or he'll risk losing his job. Tucker Carlson sits down with Clayton Morris for a wide ranging interview about the January 6th video controversy, the state of journalism, personal attacks and much more.

submitted by Orangutan from youtu.be

all 37 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (23 children)

What did happen to building 7? How did a skyscraper, not hit by any plane, also get taken down? It doesn’t make any sense.

[–]Fitter_Happier 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Pull it"

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. James Corbett does a fine job covering 9-11

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

/s/911Truth

[–]send_nasty_stuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Three buildings were rigged to be demolished. The planes were the cover and only 2 showed up.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Because of fires caused from impact debris from WTC 1.

[–]1Icemonkey 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

(((Ok)))

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

There was an investigation. But the basic physics chain of events was discovered to be:

Debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was 370 feet to the south, ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control. These lower-floor fires-which spread and grew because the water supply to the automatic sprinkler system for these floors had failed-were similar to building fires experienced in other tall buildings. The primary and backup water supply to the sprinkler systems for the lower floors relied on the city's water supply, whose lines were damaged by the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2. These uncontrolled lower-floor fires eventually spread to the northeast part of WTC 7, where the building's collapse began.

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

(((Ok)))

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Are you implying with the antisemitic symbol, the triple-brackets, that I'm Jewish, or the investigators?

If you refer to me, this is name-calling. If you refer to the investigators, this is an ad-hominem. In either case they are lower on the pyramid of debate than the comment you're replying to, which links to supporting evidence, and so is counter argument. This is against saidit.net values. I have reported your comment for dragging down the conversation on the pyramid of debate, and encourage you to do better in your future comments.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If you refer to me, this is name-calling

Whatever you say butt face. Go take your clown shoes off and take the night off. You earned it.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who were you referencing with your anti-Semitic symbol?

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oy vey, goyim are starting to notice again.

You are just as tone deaf as the jews

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

kike

[–]FreakyFalangistNational Justice Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤓

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Now do Building 6:

https://conspiracies.win/p/15JnU7N9ca/today-i-learned-about-world-trad/c/

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Burning debris from WTC 1 fell on it.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What a Thorough analysis! And you say it was burning did you? That seems real important. Seeing as how it was one of only two things you said. In fact. That's great. Just great!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pct1uEhAqBQ

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What a Thorough analysis!

Thanks.

And you say it was burning did you?

Yeah.

That seems real important.

What makes that seen important?

Seeing as how it was one of only two things you said.

I wouldn't ascribe that much importance to it. WRC 1 collapsed in due to the fire. The collapse damaged WTC 6. One would imagine that some or all of the bits of WTC 1 that came down would've been on fire. But non burning bits of a 104 floor building coming down on an adjacent 8 floor building would damage it if they weren't burning.

In fact. That's great. Just great!

No problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pct1uEhAqBQ

What's the main thesis of that YouTube video?

[–]monkeymagic 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

sesame street physics

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Sorry?

You're suggesting that a burning debris can't cause a fire except on sesame street?

[–]send_nasty_stuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a rickety old wooden barn. It equipped with sprinklers on every level and designed not to collapse even when engulfed in flames.

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why are you cock sucking so hard for kid fuckers?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc

[–]passionflounderIndependent 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part of the truth is the FACT that our government officials knowingly lied and trampled the rights of citizens because they were guilty of having the wrong political beliefs.... all in pursuit of a narrative and to secure an election steal.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

At least with the 911 truth bullshit they didn't defame a private company. The Dominion lawsuit is looking much more interesting for Fox in general due in no small part to Tucker's emails uncovered in discovery.

Tucker Carlson unloads on Sidney Powell in jaw-dropping unsealed exhibits

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

That sure was nice and vague. And unrelated.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The relationship is that Tucker Carlson spreads misinformation, including misinformation that he doesn't believe in.

He made a mistake with a clear victim when he defamed Dominion, but he's lucky that there is no such victim of his 9/11 misinformation. I suspect that this is due to good luck rather than good management, seeing how badly Fox is fearing in the defamation lawsuit.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Dominion

You are into that aren't you?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you living your whole life vanilla ... or celibate?

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You already gave yourself away by unironically using the term misinformation.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry?

What's your issue with the term "misinformation"?

[–]MuskyIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So the other networks can stick to their ideologies only if the individual employees agree? I think the way this narrative is being trouted out by the left is weird, and likely to backfire cause I'm sure all the CNN and MSNBCs of the world have reporters who disagree with their company's positions.

Imo, stuff like this, they should have to have a disclaimer that it's a conspiracy theory with no evidence, and it doesn't look good at all for Fox, but I just don't see it as a gotcha. The media are all kind of a bunch of clowns at this point.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So the other networks can stick to their ideologies only if the individual employees agree?

The point is more that if Dominion voting systems is judged to be a public figure, then defamation must have "actual malice" or "reckless disregard for the truth".

Where "actual malice" is legalese for they knew that they were lying.

This makes actual malice very arguable.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing this bow tie wearing msnbc/cnn controlled opposition faggot has to say is worth a bag of shit.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc6_5.html

[–]Drewski 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's previously criticized the 9/11 "truther" movement | (piped mirror) movement.