use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
It's All Politics
Fact check: Trump delivers wildly dishonest speech at CPAC | CNN Politics
submitted 1 year ago by dicknipples from edition.cnn.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun - 1 year ago (16 children)
Is u/dicknipples controlled opposition? Who would ever use the term "Fact Check" in a title?
[–]EternalSunset 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (12 children)
He is a socks alt. The only reason this post is on the front page is because he upvotes his own shit with a bunch of alt accounts.
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago* (10 children)
Yes. But who honestly uses the term "fact check"?
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Liberals.
[–]dicknipples[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (7 children)
I know, right?
Fuck facts - LOL
Fuck honesty, integrity, and all that crap
[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago* (5 children)
You don't seem to understand. But that would make sense if you were a dishonest plant, and fake opposition, as your apparent ignorance would be fake. On the off chance that you are not, allow me to explain. I am calling you dishonest, and mentally challenged.
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (4 children)
Who would plant a user at Saidit? George Soros? Bill Gates?
You asked: who honestly uses the term "fact check"?
Would you like an explanation? One of many potential explanations: facts, honesty, integrity, the truth, fact checks, etc. are the basis of any reasonable discourse. Challenge those and you will help frauds spread lies. It's that simple. Stop helping frauds fuck over the 99%.
[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
Site admins, in order to generate engagement.
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
lol - they hate me....
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv8uRVLN5Dc
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
That’s because you’re a pathological liar, a traitor, an asshole, and a bootlicker of oligarchy.
You haven’t even gotten the first base with any of those things. Or another human being. Who gave consent. And was legally old enough to. When you tried and failed to get it.
[–]LordoftheFlies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
People trying to get you to accept what they present as verified information?
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
(I didn't upvote this - there are 10 voters you obviously don't know shit about.)
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
People who unironically like CNN
This is the same network that the mostly peaceful riots of 2020 targeted the headquarters of. Notice they didn’t go after Fox News headquarters.
And even after that, they retroactively deserve it after they interrupted footage of an air raid (in a war they manufactured consent for) to sell fried chicken and beer.
All opposition to Trump and the GOP is controlled opposition. Anyone using camelfucker news network as a source is a bootlicker of the oligarchy.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun - (16 children)
[–]EternalSunset 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (12 children)
[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (10 children)
[–]EternalSunset 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]dicknipples[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - (5 children)
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]LordoftheFlies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]dicknipples[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)