Not defending it. Pointing out that a removal of bias in this sphere is more or less impossible. All he did was fund a bunch of examples of racist articles written by bitchy women. My question, why should we care what bitchy racists think?

The answer is more that controversial and polarizing content drives more clicks than something resembling intelligent discourse. Though I think you'd be very hard pressed to find many "anti-white" opp eds that weren't incredibly stupid bitch fests simply because coming out the gate with such a clearly racist premise means you aren't going about this from a good faith position.

You can read white supremacist literature as well and it hits the same pitfalls, yeah the poor black thug is perhaps utterly incongruent with functioning in modern civilized society, hence why prisons exist, but what about the black person who isn't a stupid thug? Or what about the white trash idiot that is just as retarded as the inner city thug?

They're so hyper focused on this issue of "race" that they fail to realize that race isn't real. It's a social construct. Like literally is not just the liberal talking point. We shouldn't care about it. All this comes down to arguments surrounding different "cultures" and these are often driven by regional and economic class distinctions far more than any racial identifications. It's simply a case that the historical realities of the slave trade resulted in the economic underclass of slaves to come primarily from one racial group. But to say that racism was the problem with slavery is beyond stupid, if half the slaves were white it would still be slavery and still be evil. The racial makeup is largely irrelevant.

Culture on the other hand is far less irrelevant and does provide for certain attitudes and shall we say, realities of patterns of living, habits, etc, that do produce real differences in people's quality of living. This is not the same as race since while the cultural background of someone is very important to determine their most likely future habits, it's not the end all be all, and people have the free will to decide what they will do and what they will not.

What we see in the US today is an epidemic of the slave mindset. From black people. Literally spouting white supremacist ideology. And white people also spouting it but pretending to be compassionate because they "don't hate" or some shit.

You here it on the news blurbs often "white people are the oppressors" "white people have all the institutional power" etc. How is that functionally different than what white supremacists say? Only the tone has changed. They fully accept the idea that white people are their betters, they simply don't like it, whereas the white supremacist accepts it and enjoys their place of superiority. Feminists are no different in this manner as they inadvertently show that they believe that the "patriarchy" is their oppressor, therefore having the power, therefore they admit to themselves that men are their "betters" and their rulers.

It is entirely a slave mentality. People who aren't racist don't adopt such attitudes.

These journalists don't suck because they are women, they suck because they are bitches. Big difference. Do they represent all journalists? No. Do they represent what makes money in a news economy that prioritizes outrage and simplistic childish ways of viewing the world vs more nuanced and intellectually challenging pieces? Absolutely.

I enjoy being mentally challenged. I expect my news to reflect my identity as a person who wants to be mentally challenged.