Ban on marijuana users owning guns is unconstitutional, U.S. judge rules

submitted by Drewski from reuters.com

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]brimshae 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

citing last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded gun rights.

That's a weird way to spell "de-restricted".

[–]CaptPenguin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Now do the rest of form 4473.

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Courts did just strike down some crap about restraining orders.

People (rightly) bitch about Trump, but there's no doubt he lit a fire under the judicial branch.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I have to agree with this on the basis of the second amendment, however, potheads are retards.

[–]jerkwad152 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Doesn't make sense anyway. They'd be too busy wolfing down Doritos to shoot anyone.

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nah man, Zebra Cakes.

[–]Drewski[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

archive.today mirror

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, thank goodness, I didn't realize this was a thing

[–]FuckTardMonkey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

news: ban on marijuana users