What is the root motivation of the two movements attacked in the underlying bill and in her amendment to it? This is the difference.

The Christian camp movement: The root motivation is to teach people the values of Christianity. Those values fundamentally boil down to belief in the existence of God and in the Christian modality for perceiving God. Christ taught compassion and suspicion of earthly authority. The person offering this amendment points out that in the camps teaching Christian values, there is a serious problem with sexual abuse. I will take her word for that, because we've seen it so many times, it's quite believable. But that's not the central tenet of the movement. It is a side-effect that everyone condemns and wants to eliminate.

The drag show movement: The motivation behind drag IS sexual confusion. This is what drag IS. You cannot have people go into drag shows and not be exposed to sexual confusion. That sexual confusion is central to sexual abuse. It is also the PURPOSE of drag.

Conclusion, the fact that there is sexual abuse at Christian camps is a tangential side-effect. Super important to root out, but it CAN be rooted out, because the sexual dysfunction is directly opposed to the underlying philosophy beneath which it is hiding. Drag, on the other hand, IS ITSELF the very tool for enabling sexual abuse. There is no separating one from the other.

People like this legislator need to acknowledge that deviant sexuality cannot lead to moral behavior, because it is inherently designed to confuse. That confusion creates pain and suffering. She's way off base here, philosophically, ethically, and morally.