you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (85 children)

It's interesting because it's Twitter working with politicians to control public opinion.

That's not what Taibi's information showed. That what you would like for it to say, but I think if Taibi had any such evidence then he would have shared it.

What he did show, was that Twitter worked with politicians to enforce their platform policies, which is different to the thing which you said.

It ties right into the Hunter Biden laptop story

Again, not what Taibi showed.

If today I hack your device and steal your data and post it on twitter, then my tweet will be taken down. If you stop and think about it for a minute, then you'll realise that that's a good rule for twitter to have.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (84 children)

They censored the coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story from MSM. Fuck yourself you boot licking semanticist.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (83 children)

They censored the coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story from MSM

The documents shared by Taibi which I read said that, at first, twitter treated it as a breach of their policy against sharing hacked PII. Then it said that after a "whirlwind" of policy review, twitter later decided it would be okay for Donald Trump's team to share it without blurring PII. That doesn't sound like someone "censoring", and it doesn't sound like a "boot" that I'd be licking.

Like "oh I really idolise twitter's account managers of the two presidential campaigns' advertising teams, who had to receive petty emails complaining about content probably at all hours. I love to lick the boot of the poorly paid trust and safety ops team who had to take referals from Trump sat on the toilet at 2am. Let me lick that blue collar boot"

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (82 children)

What are you screeching about? Twitter and the feds all acted appropriately, and there was no manipulation of public perception ever?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (81 children)

No, there were probably plenty of mistakes. That's life.

But nowhere in the documents I read was any evidence at all of a conspiracy. The emails just look like mundane business conversations. What's the point in exaggerating a story into existence where it doesn't already exist? Surely if Biden is so bad there must be real tangible things in the shared reality which the right could go after. Inventing stories for fake news damages the shared reality and I think at least one person ought to stick around saying, "guys I know this fits well in your biases. But it's not a real actual thing that's happening in reality, it's just a fun imagination exercise"

[–]Schwarzenigga 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent responses. Sorry d3rr-the-abusive-POS is trolling you. It's apparent that he and some of the other Saiditors don't want to know the facts. They want to help GOP fascists push their agenda to fuck over the 99%.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (79 children)

Seeing a screenshot of something previously alleged or even proven, makes it a story. Maybe not an interesting one.

Surely if Biden is so bad there must be real tangible things in the shared reality which the right could go after.

Here's 6 alleged Joe crimes and 400+ alleged Hunter crimes: https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/report_viewer/index.html#p=1

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (78 children)

Seeing a screenshot of something previously alleged or even proven, makes it a story. Maybe not an interesting one.

I didn't understand what you mean here. What did you see a screenshot of? What's the prior allegation that's in the screenshot?

Here's 6 alleged Joe crimes and 400+ alleged Hunter crimes

I don't know what this is, it's a 644 page document of tiny font. Could you give like a one sentences summary of - what's the actual meat and potatoes here? Because it doesn't indicate a strong debating tactic to try sending me a 600 page document. If there's six Biden crimes in there, then maybe you could start with explaining one, and pointing me to which page you think proves it. The document looks totally fucking deranged, by the way

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (77 children)

I didn't understand what you mean here. What did you see a screenshot of? What's the prior allegation that's in the screenshot?

Matt Taibbi posting pictures of the VIP Twitter content removal process, of emails

Could you give like a one sentences summary of - what's the actual meat and potatoes here?

A summary of alleged real tangible things and the Marco Polo project or whatever, to establish that "real tangible things" (crimes) may exist: https://nypost.com/2022/10/26/the-634-page-report-on-hunter-bidens-laptop/

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (76 children)

Matt Taibbi posting pictures of the VIP Twitter content removal process, of emails

You're saying that - that seeing a screenshot that proves twitter has a trust and safety team who call themselves "owls", and that proves twitter has lawyers on staff who consider questions of policy.....seeing a screenshot that proves twitter has policy review employees makes it a good story for tucker to run?

summary of alleged real tangible things

I just read all five of the tiny paragraphs in that nypost article and it doesn't explain what Biden is supposed to have done wrong or what the proof is - beyond, again, suggesting I read a deranged 650 page document.

You are the one who bought up this 650 page screed as proof of Biden's wrongdoing. Why don't you start by picking just one of these six alleged crimes and then tell me which page to look at.

I honestly dont even understand why you replied to me in the first place? You think this is NOT a non-story because it proves twitter Inc employs lawyers? And it remind you of a 650 page lunatic screed that you didn't read?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (75 children)

seeing a screenshot that proves twitter has policy review employees makes it a good story for tucker to run?

Seeing a screenshot of something previously alleged or even proven, makes it a story. Maybe not an interesting one.

I just read all five of the tiny paragraphs in that nypost article and it doesn't explain what Biden is supposed to have done wrong or what the proof is - beyond, again, suggesting I read a deranged 650 page document.

So one of my references is too short, and the other is too long. Someone is being a little picky.

I honestly dont even understand why you replied to me in the first place? You think this is NOT a non-story because it proves twitter Inc employs lawyers?

There's clearly a story here, and you can see my all of the MSM coverage and posts on this website.