you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

No, you're quite wrong, please take a look at this -

https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/2kaubu/just_a_reminder_of_what_the_senate_was_doing_the/cljns3q/

One side has a regressive base and one side has a progressive base. Individual politicians can suck but the overall direction from voters is absolutely not the same on both sides.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Figures check out. You are correct, the voter bases are equally as polarised in opposite directions.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not?

If you look at the figures - you can't come away with the conclusion that the only difference is 'giant douche' versus 'turd sandwich'. One side is trying to get a Progressive agenda done, the other side is trying to Conserve the status quo.

You can have a preference for which one of those things happens, but you can't tell me with a straight face that they're both the same.

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's nothing progressive about 'progressives'.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"There's nothing conservative about 'conservatives'"

Surely that convinced you, right? Did I sway you to my side with that incredible argument?

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no convincing delusional asshats like you. Learned that a while ago.