Tulsi Gabbard leaves Democratic Party, denounces it as 'elitist cabal'

submitted by [deleted] from foxnews.com

all 34 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]EthnocratIndependent 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    Not just that. A lot of the so-called "dissident movements" are Jew-ops too. National conservatism, libertarianism, class-based leftism, and all forms of anarchism are entirely controlled by Jews. To be truly free of Jewish influence you have to kill your inner liberal once and for all. All of the groups I mentioned above are still liberals at heart. Historically, there have been only two groups in the modern world who aren't liberal and those are reactionaries and fascists.

    [–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    "National pride has no need of the delirium of race. Anti-Semitism does not exist in Italy… Whenever things go awry in Germany, the Jews are blamed for it. "
    - Mussolini

    Also neither fascism nor nazism is reactionary. They are both progressive and revolutionary ideologies.

    [–]jet199 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Reactionary seems a buzzword at the moment.

    The woke left have so many different people against them they are struggling to find a name to cover all their enemies.

    So they are trying to say they are superior because they think more deeply about things than everyone else?

    [–]EthnocratIndependent 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I never said fascism was reactionary.

    [–]RedEyedWarriorIndependent 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Both parties are a side of the same shekel. But bad as the Republicans are, they’re still not as bad as the Democrats. If a neocon is running in the finale election in your constituency, then don’t bother voting, or at least vote Democrat to get the neocon out. But if an actually conservative Republican has won the primary, then it’s worth voting for him.

    [–]Insider 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    They're a part of the same system. Republicans did 9/11. COVID-19 was a united effort.

    They're both run by the CIA.

    [–]EddieC 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They're part of the same Pyramid System.
    The solution? Unshackle from the Pyramidian Paradigm

    [–]brimshae 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Doesn't matter, she's still not trustworthy.

    Don't trust big ol' commie titties.

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Doubt it.

    She's pretty strong on environmental issues, and doesn't hate healthcare.

    [–]LabTech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Leaving one party doesn't necessarily mean you join the other. I don't really see her ever joining the Republicans, I just see her frustrated and disappointed in what the Democrats are.

    [–]LtGreenCo 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Back when she was a presidential candidate she was all about crossing party lines and free speech and wasn't buying into the woke BS, and the Democratic party didn't like that one bit. So the DNC black-ops journalists were working hard to smear her and doing hit piece after hit piece. The mere mention of her on Reddit would cause anti-Tulsi bots to descend like vultures and go ham on smearing her. I'm surprised it's taken this long for her to leave.

    [–]RedEyedWarriorIndependent 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It takes time to leave a cult.

    [–]Pixietree 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Good for her I guess, but what is she doing going forward? Doesn't mean anything if she decides to join the republican party. Leave one corrupt party for another solves nothing.

    More importantly, is she leaving the WEF? I like what she says, but I don't trust her with shit if she is part of the young global leaders.

    [–]RedEyedWarriorIndependent 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Right on. She needs to leave the WEF before I can even consider trusting her.

    [–]BISH 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Good for her I guess, but what is she doing going forward?

    She said, "The isle of Motonui is all I ne-ed!"

    [–]AXXA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    https://gettr.com/post/p1c3lds588f

    https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1531576031307395074

    [–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    They were never going to allow her to win the nomination. They outright admitted that the voting doesn't count when they bamboozled Burnie sanders. He overwhelmingly won the most votes, but the only votes that actually get counted are those from thier super delegates.

    [–]SoCo 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Wow! Will this be a watershed moment, are will the lock the hatches down to prevent more from escaping.

    [–]IkeConn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Smart lady.

    [–]jagworms 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    About damn time. It's a wonder it took so long. For all her good qualities, she was blind to this problem for years longer than she should have. In-group psychology is a helluva drug. She better not join the GOP - we need good people willing to run outside of the binary if we ever want real change.

    [–]makesyoudownvote 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Because if she runs anything other than Democrat she get's dismissed. If she ran independent we would have absolutely no idea who she is at all. If she ran Republican she would be dismissed as being too moderate also Trump was the incumbent (who also was a Democrat until relatively recently btw, worth noting) and she never would have gotten any attention.

    As a Democrat she gets the credit of being actually heard out and listened to before they paint her with their typical "canceling brush" like they did. She got a place at the debates and a level of respect that she was able to pivot on which later made her appealing to Fox News just like Caitlyn Jenner.

    At this point though she has burned the last of those bridges and can't get anything else out of calling herself a Democrat except maybe a jab about self identification, but that's not her style.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Tulsi 2024!

    [–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Stopped clock

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    She needs to align with another party, call it Libertarian, call it Constitution, whatever, and convince other high profile politicians to join.

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Or maybe set up another party. The US could do with a few more realistic choices.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Just not her alone. Remember Ron Paul? No matter how smart and spot on he was, he couldn't win alone. She needs to bring politicians from all parties together and make a real American Patriotic party, otherwise the nation is truly FUCKED.

    [–]Insider 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    She's an op. Ron Paul is likely a real independent.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard

    assigned to the United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, in June 2020

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Interesting! Damn, another fake "good guy"... :'(

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      I don't know the names of the parties in the USA, beyond the two. I'm just suggesting she should get a group around her and create or join a third party as a group.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

        Of course more parties will pull votes away, that's how it's supposed to work.

        In a multi party system you don't get to still have the good guys and bad guys show you can cheer along with any more.

        [–]MuskyIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Of course more parties will pull votes away, that's how it's supposed to work

        In the US system the independent parties like Libertarian or Green aren't viable for anything but local offices. They don't have a shot in the upper echelons of politics, they can't compete with the two main parties, and voting for them can be even worse than throwing away your vote. Ranked voting could fix that. Then we can support third parties without sabotaging the actual viable candidates.

        [–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Macron's party in France was just like that until one day their guy became president. Party power can switch very quickly without ranked voting. Ranked voting rather tends to keep the same people in power for generations because they can always get into a coalition somehow.

        [–]Anman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        GOVERNMENT PERSON LEAVE GOVERNMENT TEAM TO JOIN GOVERNMENT TEAM TO WORK FOR GOVERNMENT AGAIN.

        And the cycle of tard continues.

        [–]doginventer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Council on Foreign Relations https://web.archive.org/web/20190212172555/https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster