Who gains most from Nord Stream sabotage?

submitted by [deleted] from (asiatimes.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's a country who keeps committing acts of terrorism to further their political goals

This country also keeps fucking around on the sea bed.

The same country also has a strategic naval base a stone's throw from the explosions. So they didn't need to rely on passing the Skagerrak undetected

The same country also is desperate to get NS2 activated (this explosion destroyed the only alternative to ns2).

The same country in addition had it's shills and mouthpieces immediately blame America, including their UN secretary, within hours of the explosions..

This country is also desperate for an escalation which will scare the west and end the war.

That country is the ruzzia.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's not obvious that Russia gains a lot from the sabotage. They could already stop the flow of gas at their end, if that's what they wanted.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mean in NS1 which the ruzzia stopped sending gas thru in August, claiming that a compression generator was rusted and only a removal of sanctions could fix? You surely don't mean NS2 which was never active?