you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

Is that what you think I said?

You can be as proud or ashamed as you want to be.

But the level of pigmentation you were born with, shouldn't drive either emotion. That's crazy.

You're a racist piece of shit for saying white people

Well answer me then - what is "white people"? What is this state of peoplehood which unites muslim kosovars and animist suomi, Indo-Europeans andi Finno-Ugric and celts and Romans and Saxons? Because you're attesting it exists, so explain to me what it is

[–]NuclearBadger 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

You called someone racist for saying be proud to be white.

So you are, by definition, judging by race.

Hur dur you have different genetics from the person across the street so what's white.

Yes, there are trash white countries. Being white is only 10% genetic. 90% culture. It's been diluted that much because it's the lowest common demoninator.

I'm quite happy to say there are plenty of white cultures that need to die out, but when there's a tsunami coming you don't give a shit that the fences need repainting do you.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

So you are, by definition, judging by race

No, by definition, I am judging by the things you're proud of. If you build an elaborate fake worldview about your pigmentation and then draw pride from it, I am not racist to call you an idiot

Being white is only 10% genetic. 90% culture

Wow 90%! Such a large percentage! You'd think, in that case, if it was so large, someone would be able to explain it to me? Please tell me what is this huge percentage of shared culture that unites bosniaks and Irish and Estonians and kosovars and Portuguese and Prussians?

[–]NuclearBadger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

You're living it you retard.

Also stop using English, use your own language. Hebrew perhaps.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

Stop using English. That's what your argument has devolved to now that you've ran the course. Great job dipshit.

You're living it

Wow so it's a phenomenon personal to myself which I get to describe? Clearly you're unwilling to impart a definition upon the life i am living, so it's up to me to assess my life and answer, what is this thing which unites bosniaks and Scots but arbitrarily excludes Syriacs and Moors? Well, as long as you're letting me decide, I'll answer - there is no such thing, it's bullshit, you're making it up because you live in a racist colonial mindset

[–]NuclearBadger 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

Show me a city made by niggers that is comparable to anything in white majority countries.

I'll wait.

E: Actually I wont, you won't find any.

White culture is the western world. We work for fun. We invent things for fun. We shit on the lowest ranks and fight to be better. There is now far too many leeches so the system that was built by whites is now being destroyed through gluttony and greed. White people are random. We have mass variations in everything, that's why it works. Low potato iq downys to geniuses so everyone can do something to help.

It won't matter soon if you want to be a tosser and say whites don't exist, good for you, but then I'm going to assume you have somali levels of iq, or you're a saboteur.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

What a disgusting post.

Maybe the Nigerian ancient city of Eredo - which was the largest in the world in the middle ages, larger than Rome or Baghdad. Maybe Eredo would have been great if the Niger Delta wasn't pillaged by Europeans.

Or what about ancient Zanzibar, with its 20,000 years of beautiful stone structures. Maybe Zanzibar would have been great today, if it wasn't pillaged by Arabs.

Or what about that great home of learning Timbuktu, with its three ancient universities built in a beautiful and unique style? What would that city be today, if Mali wasn't pillaged by foreigners during the scramble for africa?

Or what about Mansa Musa, the richest man in the world, richer than all of Europe put together. What about the empire of Songhay with its high-tech and elaborate speedboats? What would their wonders be today, if not for all the pillaging?

[–]NuclearBadger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

What if, what if, what if, uuhhhh speedboats

White countries are great DESPITE being pillaged on a daily basis.

Blacks can't even install water pumps, paid for by gullible whites, without niggers coming and stealing the metal for scrap because they have 0 forsight. They literally have to bolt them to the ground to stop them being stolen.

You trying to tell me THOSE people would make wakanda if we just left them alone lmao!

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

It's hateful nonsense but let's entertain for just a second.

So there is some gene which expresses itself behaviourally in stealing metal for scrap, and it's co-existant with the gene for dark pigmentation.

So let's say a person with pale pigmentation and a person with dark pigmentation make a baby together. According to your hateful pseudoscience, only one such person has the additional gene for stealing metal for scrap.

Let's be generous to your theory and say, that the recessive allele does not cause the metal stealing behaviour, and so, all the dark pigmented people have a dominant gene for metal stealing.

What do you think happens for the one-quarter of babies born to such couples, who have the (dark pigmented) parent's dominant allele for metal stealing and the (light pigmented) parent's absolute lack of any genes expressing this behaviour.

I'll tell you what happens - a total scrambling of the code: born with a stomach on the outside, or born with two hearts, or born with hands where their feet should be.

We would expect fully one-fourth of all mixed children to have severe birth defects and that just isn't happening in reality. Therefore your pseudoscience is just that - imaginary -and has provably zero bearing on reality.

So now we know you're making it up - we must ask why? Why is he doing this? Why does he use just foul racially charged language and mix it with pseudo racial science? It's because you're a racist shitbag. Nobody should be taking your nonsense seriously, it's provably and demonstrably wrong, and clearly coming from a position of hatred. So, go fuck yourself asshole

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

I couldn't help but notice that what you said to /u/NuclearBadger is laughable Wakanda-style fiction.

So there is some gene which expresses itself behaviourally

Brains and bodies are complex.

There are multiple genes that form compounding conditions that are a person's abilities and behaviors and noticeably different tendencies across the spectrum, as for intellect, aggression, impulses, strength, physiology and on and on.

So let's say a person with pale pigmentation and a person with dark pigmentation make a baby together.

You keep shapeshifting your argument back to "skin color" in isolation, the typical duplicitous leftist tactic, even though I previously mentioned everything is always a genetic argument and skin color only happens to be a high correlative vestige of its respective races. So if you want to use it for argumentative rhetoric you should make it clear that it's "pigment tied to a white man" and "pigment tied to black man" at minimum.

According to your hateful pseudoscience, only one such person has the additional gene for stealing metal for scrap.

The roll of the dice with multiple causes for traits becomes a mostly 50-50 chance game of averaging in the middle (intelligence, behaviors, body, skin color, etc.) over the aggregate, while on the individual level the offspring may have large tilts one way or the other (higher or lower intelligence, higher or lower aggression, skin color more white or more black than the averaged, body shapes, etc) through the luck or unluck of the draw of what minimum and maximal genes the parents have. In other words, a white and black breeding is on average likely to have an average between them. When blacks have a population with a higher percent of people who carry the higher traits of psychopathy and violent impulsiveness and a lower percent of people with higher brain capacity (physically/mentally), for example, then those breeding cases with whites over time will (it goes without saying) result in their offspring exhibiting and perpetuating those traits in higher numbers (vs. non-interracial whites breeding).

It shouldn't be hard to understand. Nature is rather simple even when it's complex underneath. Evidence is obvious and empirical and all around you once you take off your ideological blinders. Jumping through hoops to falsely explain the world with a causation based solely on not wanting your feelings to be hurt is the antithesis of truth.

[–]HanssenBob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In your view, things are hateful because you hate them; words are disgusting because they're true, but you wish they weren't; science becomes pseudoscience because you don't like the conclusions.

It's all so narcissistic. Go get boosted.

[–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao, cry harder. I specifically mentioned niggers, because it's a culture. Gypsys are white niggers. I mentioned blacks can't get anything done because niggers fuck everything up for them. It was YOU who assumed all niggers are black, not me.

Your post has so much cope in it that it's painful lol.