you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It’s California.

Free speech is a constitutional right, which means a constitutional analysis would be done.

Free speech has always been limited, see libel and slander, also fighting words and public decency.

I agree with you, you would think that would not be upheld in court. Who will challenge it?

It seems that a doctor should have broad protections to administer medicine. But the government has an interest in the publics well-being. Doctors are also liable under malpractice law.