politics

politics

all 20 comments

CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

That is what is at the heart of the entire conflict.

it's that simple

"And this is what you should think about it"

Most of your submissions have your own ideological opinions baked into the title.

You put opinion oil on the propaganda fire.

Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

It's an accurate statement; I stand by it.

If you disagree, tell us why. Don't just throw personal insults at me, in violation of Saidit TOS.

IMissPorn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 1 year ago

Oh no, the TOSers followed me from reddit.

Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

So, how about that lawfare? On Saidit we follow the Pyramid of Debate. Address the arguments. Insults are grounds to be banned.

[deleted] 9 insightful - 8 fun9 insightful - 7 fun10 insightful - 8 fun 1 year ago

[deleted]

[deleted] 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun 1 year ago

Insults are grounds to be banned.

Chipit is a poopyface

Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun 1 year ago

I need for you do something for me now Chipit. I need you to look at the pyramid of debate. Then point to place on the pyramid of debate entitled "name calling". Are you doing that? Are you pointing at it now? See where it is located on the pyramid of debate? It is there is it not? So if someone calls you a name, they are adhering to the pyramid of debate are they not? Now stop being a dumb ass.

CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

If you disagree, tell us why.

Low-budget propaganda messages don't improve anything.

If anything, it makes the situation worse by polarizing both sides.

Saying nothing is a better tactic than stating transparent talking points; assuming you're not intentionally pushing the divide and conquer agenda.

A questionable assumption.

Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

Once again, completely avoiding the point of the post. Tell us why the Supreme Court should or should not legislate from the bench.

CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 1 year ago

Once again, completely avoiding the point of the post.

People should decide for themselves.

Tell us why the Supreme Court should or should not legislate from the bench.

That's what the comments section is for.

People should think for themselves, and don't need your unsolicited input.