you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

This is a profoundly meaningful datapoint.

The importance of this article (not alone, I have seen many references to this truth in the past 6 months) is that this school is where the ruling class sends their own kids. I happen to be familiar with this network of private schools in New York City; I was a student there. I grew up in this society (decades ago, fortunately).

This datapoint explains why the "Grooming" word is so difficult for the ruling class to understand. They are willing to destroy their own children. Grooming makes it sound like they are stealing the children of the lower classes for their sexual needs. Ironically, it's actually worse than that. They truly believe this shit, and they are okay with the destruction of their own children on the altar of this ideology. It's not about political exploitation of their inferiors. These parents are so thoroughly morally corrupted that they have adopted a religious moral code that celebrates the lifelong destruction of their own children.

It's the dark side of the religious impulse. Having abandoned traditional Christianity (until 40 years ago, the dominant US religious tradition), a spiritual void developed. Here is the force that has arrived to fill that void.

If it makes us feel any better, the ruling class is sharing the pain with us as we descend. It's a murder/suicide. They are destroying children at all levels, and that includes their own. Nobody will be spared the spiritual death that is taking us over at an ever-accelerating pace.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

These are not the ruling class.

[–]StillLessons[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Can you expand? If not them, who is? As a pupil of one of these schools, I was surrounded by children of bankers, lawyers, politicians and people high up in the corporate world. Who is the ruling class if not these people?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Soros, Rothschild, Zuckerberg, schwab, gates, Goldman, Sachs, DuPont, Rockefeller, and probably a handful more who's names we don't know. Those are the "royal" families and they rule over the dukes like the Clinton's, bushes, and whomever supervises childless puppets like Merkel.

Not everyone with these names is necessarily in the inner circle but no one in the inner circle does not have these names.

A key indicator is the fact that the people you are talking about have jobs. Someone is paying them to do stuff for them. Royalty does not work.

[–]StillLessons[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You and I are using two different scales to define "the ruling class". Yours is the narrow scale, and in that sense you're right. They are the very top of the pyramid. But no royalty can function without the apparatus of rule around them. This is Orwell's Inner Party vs Outer Party. The Inner Party does not possess the manpower to rule. They require a population of privileged functionaries to enact the mechanics of running the territory. These people also rule in the sense that they manage many of the mechanisms that crush the population around them, and they are rewarded with the benefit of their positions. In the simplest response to what you're saying, I would point out that a monarch never rules a country. The monarch represents a class of thousands of people who - in their sworn allegiance to him/her - actually execute the "rule" in the monarch's name. You have come up with a small group of people who are sitting at the very top of the pyramid. But those people can only exist in co-existence with the larger class of people surrounding them and executing the "rule" of the country. This class is the key to functionality and endurance of any system.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But those people can only exist in co-existence with the larger class of people surrounding them and executing the "rule" of the country.

As the population is culled the need for administrators dwindles. Therfore the population of administrators also must be proportionally reduced. There is no reason to think the administrators would be spared the propaganda or the subversion. It would only introduce the completely unnecessary threat that one of them would grow a conscience and expose the subversion.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Zuckerberg still has to do his own commercials.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His ego made him do it.