The moment you realize that not even the New York Times reads the New York Times

submitted by BravoVictor from i.imgur.com

all 20 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Would love to see their reply!!! The NYT is a joke.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Socks favourite tho

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They won't bother replying. Contacting her is obviously a waste of time.

[–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Ukraine is an odd place. It has always been a corrupt place, even back in the Soviet era. Are people just realizing this now?

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

No, now ukraine is virtuous because it is against badrussianman. We know badrussianman is bad because he got along with orangemanbad.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Agreed. It's why there were revolts in 2014, against the pro-Russian corruption. Developments since then to reduce pro-Russian corruption have been difficult, and are now really costly.

Candace Owens is apparently an idiot. The NYT writers don't have to memorize all of the previous articles. They just wanted her point of view.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You are an idiot. Class A shill, right here.

Lol, literally covering up for the NYT and NATO and the DNC. What a pussy.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you can only be an asshole, rather than make an argument? Seems you're the idiot. I've told you how the NYT journalists contact people. This doesn't cover for them, or for NATO (whatever the fuck you're trying to suggest here). If you can't develop a counter argument, stop embarrassing yourself with your whining. Grow up. Moreover - are you against NATO? Who the fuck are you?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I can only be an asshole to obvious left-wing shills.

I'm against warmongers. So, the RNC, the DNC, and many other political groups are hated by me.

As they should be.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again no argument about the NYT. If you want to discuss warmongers, discuss that. Not all parties are the same with regard to this issue. The only issue for the US at the moment is how to reduce the war crimes in Ukraine, as we're part of NATO. If you don't support NATO, and the right to defend the innocent, you to could be one of the innocent victims some day. It's not warmongering, as the US is not at war with Russia. It's support for innocent people. So - argue your case or don't.

[–]Radish 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Using sex-based slur.

[–]AXXA 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You can clearly tell from the URL of the NYT articles she cited that they were written in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The NYT writers don't have to memorize all of the previous articles.

Yeah, they can research them though to see where their own publication stands on issues they're reporting on.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They can, and they may have done, and they now want to discuss the similar issues now that things have changed somewhat. Candace has developed a nothing burger here.

[–]Smarterthanlastweek2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Seems like she lobbed the ball right back into their court pretty well.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

she indicated that she's got nothing else to say. It was helpful to them. They know not to bother her again.

She's also nobody - and a traitor to fellow blacks, and dropped out of URI (really weak), and she's using this email from the NYT in a manner that supports the slaugter of innocent civilians in Ukraine.

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A NYT write would have to be completely ignorant of any of Ukraine's history, to not realize that corruption has been a huge topic for ages.

The corruption problem was mostly not about Russia either, yet accusations of corruption, stemming from Russia's lobbying efforts, just happened to be the final straw, sparking the super violent and deadly (on both sides) civil uprising that overthrew the President.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Western propaganda. Some sheeple won't admit that it even exists.

[–]jostiniane 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I dindo dis

[–]JewryBTFO 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For the Jew York Times to read the Jew York Times would be Fascism, as the JYT is an imperialist apparatus, and actually reading that drivel would be turning the imperialist apparatus against itself.