you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

For someone who's not SJW, you sure are using their talking points.

What's a kafkatrap?

Asking for evidence or pointing out contradictions is taken as a moral affront: only people acting in bad faith could ask to be convinced of the ubiquity of such a glaring problem. Debating people who think like this is a deeply unsettling experience. No matter the discussion, they will constantly and automatically change the subject to the conditions of the discussion itself, in order to derail the good points being made.

Arguing with them and trying to meet them on a level field is like trying to argue with a Jehovah's Witness. Only difference is a JW is at least willing to talk to disbelievers in hopes of converting/winning them over. An SJW thinks doing so is pointless because those disbelievers should know better and is therefore a way for them to sort the "tainted" from the "pure". In fact, according to this, logic itself is seen as a harmful tool of "the Devil" it tries to purge from civilization.

They're not liberals. They're just bigots. No wonder we despise them on instinct.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They're responses to your links, that you picked, how could they be SJW talking points?

they will constantly and automatically change the subject to the conditions of the discussion itself, in order to derail the good points being made.

Ie exactly what you are doing now?

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They're exactly what SJWs say. The part about it's OK to teach children to hate each other because of the debunked theory of "white fragility". Boy, for someone who's not an SJW, you sure talk like one.

Say, how about that George Floyd? Was he an innocent victim, or a multiple felon who abandoned his children and pointed a gun at the belly of a pregnant woman?

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So you ignored everything I wrote and are repeating yourself. Bro, you a bot?

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You still don't know what a kafkatrap is.