Poll Reveals Shocking Number of Dems Would Incarcerate Unvaccinated Americans

submitted by JasonCarswellVoluntaryist from (usafeatures.news)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

We also let Jews migrate here and gave them equal citizenship.

Let!?!? LOL! Jews have been in America going back to the 1600s. If America let Jews migrate here, why is it then that the American government did not grant Anne Frank's family, along with other Jews during World War II asylum to migrate to America?

You're welcome.

For what!? lol

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (14 children)

why is it then that the American government did not grant Anne Frank's family, along with other Jews during World War II asylum to migrate to America?

I heard Anne Frank's diary was written with a ball point pen.

A pen that wasn't invented during the WW2 German occupation. Weird.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

I heard Anne Frank's diary was written with a ball point pen.

You heard wrong, you were lied to by a holocaust denying white supremacist.

The origin of the “ballpoint myth” is the four-page report that the Federal Criminal Police Office (the Bundeskriminalamt or BKA) in Wiesbaden, which was published in 1980. In this investigation into the types of paper and ink used in the diary of Anne Frank it is stated that “ballpoint corrections” had been made on some loose sheets. The BKA’s task was to report on all the texts found among the diaries of Anne Frank, and therefore also on the annotations that were made in Anne’s manuscripts after the war.

In short: the “ballpoint myth” is easy to disprove. The careless wording of the BKA report from 1980 – a report that for the rest in no way challenges the authenticity of the diary – or at any rate its openness to several interpretations, has taken on a life of its own in extreme right-wing circles.

The “ballpoint myth” is based on the simple fact that, around 1960, two annotation sheets with ballpoint writing were inserted between the original pages. These texts were written by a graphological researcher, and are not included in any edition of the diary (apart from the Critical Edition, where photos of the annotation sheets are reproduced). In July 2006, the BKA found it necessary to state in a press release that the 1980 investigation cannot be used to call the authenticity of the diary into doubt.

A pen that wasn't invented during the WW2 German occupation. Weird.

Anne did not write her diary in a ballpoint pen.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Ok.

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

And the Holocaust wasn't mainstream in movies and television until the 1970s and 1980s.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Whoa, just like that you're not going to defend the lie of Anne Frank's diary being written in ballpoint pen? You're not going to provide your own source that says her diary was written in a ballpoint pen?

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

There's nothing to explain, that's another white supremacist lie.

Shalom

✡️

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Can you explain why hard copy dictionaries and encyclopedias that are older than 1960 don't reference the WW2 Holocaust?

There's nothing to explain, that's another white supremacist lie.

This is easy to independently confirm.

Many consignment stores have used book sections.

It seems unlikely that every pre-60's dictionary and encyclopedia publishers overlooked significant historical events.

It wouldn't be surprising to see political biases represented in reference texts.

Failing to include any reference to the Holocaust is an entirely different matter.

Weird.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

Source?

Anne did not write her diary in a ballpoint pen.

Obviously. But it's alleged that the guy who capitalized on it finished the diary and used the ballpoint pen.

If this incidental case is actually a myth about Anne Frank's diary it does not negate the overwhelming amount of bullshit surrounding the official Holocaust narrative that crumbles under some fundamentally basic premises and an abundance of evidence.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Source?

Here.

But it's alleged that the guy who capitalized on it finished the diary and used the ballpoint pen.

That's a lie, he did not "finish" her diary in ballpoint pen.

The “ballpoint myth” is based on the simple fact that, around 1960, two annotation sheets with ballpoint writing were inserted between the original pages. These texts were written by a graphological researcher, and are not included in any edition of the diary (apart from the Critical Edition, where photos of the annotation sheets are reproduced). In July 2006, the BKA found it necessary to state in a press release that the 1980 investigation cannot be used to call the authenticity of the diary into doubt.

There you have it, the annotated notes were not included in any edition of the diary.

does not negate the overwhelming amount of bullshit surrounding the official Holocaust narrative that crumbles under some fundamentally basic premises and an abundance of evidence.

That's because holocaust deniers wont accept any evidence as being true.

Shalom

✡️

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's because holocaust deniers wont accept any evidence as being true.

I grew up believing in the Holocaust. I saw people online saying things I knew were wrong but when I went to disprove them, I couldn't. There is a shocking lack of documentation considering the scope. I mean, I can look up what Napoleon's army ate.

I don't think there is enough existing evidence to prove there was a Holocaust beyond a reasonable doubt. You know those Germans, lousy at keeping records.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Your source is https://www.AnneFrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/authenticity-diary-anne-frank/ and you even obscured the address in a link. Not biased much at all. /s/

That's a lie,

FALSE. A lie requires malice intent. And you haven't proven nor disproven the veracity of your claims - or mine.

he did not "finish" her diary in ballpoint pen.

This may or may not be true.

There you have it,

False. There we have something. Far from conclusive. You want me to trust the professional systemic bullshitters, including you? Not a fucking chance.

That's because holocaust deniers wont accept any evidence as being true.

It seems now you're the liar.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

and you even obscured the address in a link. Not biased much at all. /s/

I didn't obscure a thing, the word "here" is obviously hyperlinked and people can see that and click on "here" to go to the site I linked to. There's no reason to include the url.

FALSE. A lie requires malice intent.

lol, a lie does not require malice intent.

an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker or writer to be untrue with intent to deceive

This may or may not be true.

You're living in denial. Annotations were made in ballpoint pen. If you had a source to back up your claim you would be quick to post it. By not posting it and just saying it might be true means you cant discredit that only annotations were made in ballpoint pen.

False. There we have something. Far from conclusive.

Because you want to play ignorant and deny the holocaust.

It seems now you're the liar.

Nope.

Shalom

✡️

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

_I didn't obscure a thing, the word "here" is obviously hyperlinked and people can see that and click on "here" to go to the site I linked to. There's no reason to include the url.

We all know many won't click it or are lazy. Your obfuscation certainly fails when called out.

lol, a lie does not require malice intent.

LIAR.

Deception is malicious. YOU are malicious.

I could be incorrect, wrong, factually inaccurate, or provide misinformation - and mean well, without lying.

" A lie is an assertion that is believed to be false, typically used with the purpose of deceiving someone. [...] Lies may serve a variety of instrumental, interpersonal, or psychological functions for the individuals who use them. Generally, the term "lie" carries a negative connotation, and depending on the context a person who communicates a lie may be subject to social, legal, religious, or criminal sanctions. "

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie

If you had a source to back up your claim you would be quick to post it.

Wrong. I've already stated that I'm agnostic, I remain skeptical, and I don't care to verify any Anne Frank stories, true or false. I'm not here for that, and I'm simply too lazy to bother researching this trivial point to argue with a verifiable malicious shill liar who's here to stir up shit. I'm here to build a case to get you banned.

By not posting it and just saying it might be true means you cant discredit that only annotations were made in ballpoint pen.

Again, lying with fallacious bullshit conclusions pulled from your ass.

Because you want to play ignorant and deny the holocaust.

Because you're a (((Zionist))) agent of chaos you use the bullshit propaganda "denier" label to black tar me.

I'm a skeptic.

I'm open to being proven wrong. Are you?

Feel free to watch the "Spinning Squirrel" documentary (https://www.bitchute.com/video/eNde8bT9zFXS/) about some of the big exaggerations and big lies about the Holocaust. Then you may get back to me to dissect and counter overwhelming counter-narrative and I'll consider the counter-counter-evidence and arguments you present. But you argue like shit so you'll have to up your manipulative game.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you hover over a link, the URL appears in the bottom left corner.

[–]AXXA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you. You're right. Usually though I just paste the link without a hyperlink because it's easier to see.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

So you took this country by force? I see.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist[S] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

The Purple Gang dindu nuffin, allegedly.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nope

Shalom

✡️

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nope.

Shalom

✡️

[–]send_nasty_stuff 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

Jews have been in America going back to the 1600s.

South America. Managing their slave holdings.

Shalom.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

South America is not "America". New Amsterdam was not located in South America.

Shalom

✡️

[–]send_nasty_stuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ok Lopez.