you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hhhaa shooting your load over Nick Fuentes

Their TOS:

Nonetheless, you may not post on or transmit through the Service any unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, libelous, indecent, vulgar, obscene, sexually explicit, pornographic, profane, hateful, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind...

[–]BravoVictor[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm curious what he said, if anything, that got him banned. Or if it was proactive. Naturally, they refuse to explain, other than the meaningless boilerplate, "he violated our terms and conditions blah blah blah".

Exactly how Twitter operates. People they don't like just...disappear.

I wonder what their business plan is? They're acting exactly like Twitter, but they're not going to out-Twitter Twitter. And even without competition, it took Twitter over a decade to workout some path to profitability.

But they're also not trying to compete in any of the areas where Twitter has massive weakness, like it's very vague and overbroad censorship.