you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

ok yeah I know but from my reading it didn't change the meaning of this so I wanted to see how you interpreted it

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It provides some rationale. Whether the context adds anything to to claim I'd certainly up for debate, but removing the clause from the final sentence was at best incredibly sloppy and perhaps the worst part of this. Omitting the paragraphs was also bad, albeit to a lesser extent if he would summarise them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I feel it's not really doctoring evidence to just not say the entire thing, repubs can and should just read the entire thing if they feel that makes them look better.

[–]Trajan 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Editing a sentence to remove its final clause, adding a full stop to make it appear the sentence ended there isn't doctoring?