you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]aukofthecovenant 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Current top comment:

Nothing wrong with this, Twitter is free to remove speech from its platform that it does not want to promote. The person behind the account is free to track Nancy's investments over at Parler.

8 hours later, further down in the comments, the same user writes:

It'll never go to parler because Twitter has hundreds of millions of users. Millions can see his tweets within seconds of making a new post. He wont get that at parler. Without Twitter's platform, the person behind the account knows their tweets wont be seen in large numbers so going to Parler is not worth the effort.

amusedface.jpg

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The person behind the account is free to track Nancy's investments over at Parler.

That still remains true, he can take his services to parler where all of 10 people will see his tweets.

It'll never go to parler because Twitter has hundreds of millions of users.

That still remains true too. He can take his services to parler but he wont because it will be a waste of time because the guy knows nobody will see his tweets at parler. He enjoys Twitter's larger audience.

Shalom

✡️