you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Wahhabists are the real problem, a smaller vocal minority of extremists - akin to Zionists.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

u/whenimbanned will deny this

[–]WhenImBanned 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

If a fasiq comes to you with news, verify it first. What about when a disbeliever comes to you with news?

As if people who work for the CIA are all covered in tattoos top to bottom like Mexican prison gangs and almost all of them in the group have to cover them up. As if CIA isn't a high end job in which tattoos are frowned upon and they are also in fact a liability since it can be used to identify you.

Also pretty nonsensical to believe CIA would establish a state that stuck to the sharia more than Saudi Arabia, when America intends to rid what's left of the sharia from the Middle East. And then America bombed their own CIA agents that established a sharia state complete purified from the filth of the federal reserve banks and use gold as their currency.

Just like when the kuffar couldn't handle being attacked by people hiding in caves so they wanted to play it off as a conspiracy theory, saying America attacked herself just to keep pretending America is untouchable.

Taliban, Al Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, Hamas etc none of these are CIA made they are all people who at least legitimately believe they are Muslims, even if some people dislike it.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

As if people who work for the CIA are all covered in tattoos top to bottom

As if I said that.

As if CIA isn't a high end job in which tattoos are frowned upon

As if CIA doesn't hire assets from all walks of life to work for the agents.

Also pretty nonsensical to believe CIA would establish a state that stuck to the sharia more than Saudi Arabia

Because CIA doesn't want full spectrum dominance for complete totalitarian control?

CIA top priorities: 1) collect power 2) plausible deniability 3) there is nothing else.

Also, when in Rome... weaponize Romans against Rome.

Saudi Arabia, when America intends to rid what's left of the sharia from the Middle East.

Seems like you believe the corporate media bullshit. USA/Israel brought to power and supports Saudi Arabia and their extremist Wahhabism. Why didn't the USA attack the home nation of the 15 hijackers after 9/11?

purified from the filth of the federal reserve banks and use gold as their currency.

Central banksters will Muammar Gaddafi anyone who dares to defy them and use gold as their currency.

saying America attacked herself

Because that's never happened before. /s

none of these are CIA made they are all people who at least legitimately believe they are Muslims

Knowingly or not, you need not be CIA to work for them, and people can be or believe more than one thing simultaneously - even contradictions.

cc /u/Airbus320

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Accurately presented

[–]WhenImBanned 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So central banksters Gaddafi'd ISIS who used gold as their currency in defiance who were actually CIA so central banksters bombed the CIA for de- To be honest all this is surface level corny conspiracy theories. The "wahabis" as you call them are vehemently opposed to Saudi Arabia and their rulers. That's all I have the energy to explain. "It was the CIA who did it because POWER" is just a superficial buzzword of an explanation. ISIS blew up CIA headquarters in a suicide attack. US backed terrorists do not face social shunning or negative propaganda. Just look at the PKK.