all 4 comments

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

A complete breach of justice.

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Nope, the three men saw him commit no crime but yet they still found it necessary to follow him in their trucks, restrict his freedom of movement and then murder him. The killer himself on the stand said he did not see Arbery commit any crime.

Look at the bright side though, Arbery's father is "one of the good blacks" because he said, "All Lives Matter" at a press conference after a verdict was reached.

Shalom

✡️️

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    if Kyle Rittenhouse had been found guilty then that would have set a legal precedent

    No it wouldn't. A precedent is only set when a higher court affirms a lower court's decision. Miranda Vs. Arizona, Brown Vs. Board of Education and Mapp v. Ohio for example. Those decisions were legal precedents.

    Arbery's attackers would have had a legal right to chase and kill Arbery.

    lol, the law don't work that way, see above.

    Shalom

    ✡️️

    [–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    President Biden praised the jury's guilty verdict in the trial for Ahmaud Arbery's killers on Wednesday, but called the case "a devastating reminder of how far we have to go in the fight for racial justice in this country."

     

    Justice has been served!!!

    Shalom

    ✡️️