you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What are the correct numbers then?

people arent falling for yet more deflection from you. but keep this shit up, it 'actually IS'(see what i did there?) entertaining.

So far I've provided data, and you've provided none.

so far youve provided bullshit, like always.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

There's literally nothing in this comment. If you think the numbers I linked to are wrong, show me what the correct numbers are, so we can work out the errors. If you don't know what the correct numbers are, you've got no basis to claim the ones I linked to are wrong. You're just talking shit.

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

youve been owned time and time again, the fact that you are requesting me to do it yet again for you makes it clear you are a paid poster, or a dumbass.

If you think the numbers I linked to are wrong, show me what the correct numbers are, so we can work out the errors.

LOL! im for sure going to get together with you to 'work out the errors'!

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've linked to the data. You've not refuted that data.

"LOL" is not a refutation.