all 4 comments

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    why wouldn't he just lie and say no

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      why does that mean he can't lie, him and other politicians lie daily.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Garland said: "I'm not going to violate this norm of the rule of law. I'm not going to comment on investigation that's ongoing. "

        I'm not sure what this means, it sounds kind of like he is pleading the fifth, or talking about some sort of part of the law where if he answered . . . I don't know what would happen but violating the rule of law sounds like he's saying it'd be illegal to answer. Why didn't Massie ask what that meant?

        [–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        If he told the truth all of the people charged would win their cases with ease, so he must stay silent in order to continue the political persecution of Trump supporters.