Vladimir Putin slams 'monstrous' West for teaching children they can change their gender, saying it is 'close to a crime against humanity

submitted by Rob3122 from (dailymail.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (92 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (49 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Canbot 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      It is not free speech that allows jews the power to subvert society like this. It is the jews ability to deny speech to thier opposition.

      All it would take to stop them is the ability to reach the masses with logical explanations, sufficiently long enough to break the brainwashing. That can't be done because there are not enough protections from Jewish censorship.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 9 fun4 insightful - 8 fun5 insightful - 9 fun -  (20 children)

          Free speech has been nothing but destructive to humanity.

          Found the Reddit mod

          [–][deleted]  (18 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

            engaging in various forms of degeneracy

            i think its more degenerate to stifle thought and expression. its also incredibly dumb. try to get that tiny brain working on that.

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

            speech, thoughts, expressions, ok keep them free. But outlaw degenerate acts like actually becoming a tranny.

            [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

            speech, thoughts, expressions, ok keep them free. But outlaw degenerate acts like actually becoming a tranny.

            outlaw degenerate acts. as usual, you have the dumbest take on this. i dont get this recent push for trans shit either, but who decides whats 'degenerate'? dumbfucks like you? that is what has gotten us where we are at now. some dudes like wearing womens clothes, who gives a fuck. not all gay/trans people are the morons people see on tv. i wear idiotic tshirts sometimes, is that next on your list hitler?

            [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

            common sense decides what's degenerate. long time traditions and customs. Why are we even debating this.

            [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

            common sense decides what's degenerate. long time traditions and customs. Why are we even debating this.

            LOL!!!

            [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

            based on your name I'm guessing you're from india. Illegal immigration should be outlawed for common sense reasons too, it's like that. Same with outlawing murder, this shit is all common sense. No more allowing children to be mutilated. Common sense.

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Yes

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            try to get that tiny brain working on that.

            That's the only reason he supports censorship. I bet someone proved him wrong in a debate and crushed his ego.

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Wow

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Let's be honest, you only want "free speech" preserved so that you can continue pretending to be a woman and engaging in various forms of degeneracy.

            And you only want to censor your political opponents, because you know you can't win an argument, and the only people who agree with you are the six self-described neo-Nazis you've only ever talked to over the Internet.

            That's the true motivation behind libertarians.

            Do Libertarians want to ban abortion, shut down the borders, give everyone free healthcare, and raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour?

            Right-wing SJWs are just as entertaining as left-wing SJWs! I wonder if you'll have a mental break-down like Horux did — snow-flakes are so sensitive. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to waste.

            [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Found the Reddit mod

            got a legit lol out of me

            [–]Flicksener 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

            What you're describing is fascism. No thank you. Only the weak and scared advocate for the censorship of speech.

            [–][deleted]  (9 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Flicksener 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

              And you clearly don't know what Democracy is and what it's brought to the world if you're rallying against freedom of speech. Limiting speech is fascistic. Pretty simple to understand.

              [–][deleted]  (5 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Flicksener 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

                Democracy doesn't work compared to what? What other forms of government are there that are better?

                Also, is the mostly Democratic West and its massive progress and success in just about every human field imaginable over the last few hundred years not good enough for you? Would you rather live under a Communist Dictatorship like China, or Communist Dictatorship like Russia, or a Monarchist Dictatorship like Thailand, or whatever the hell most countries in Africa are ruled under?

                [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]Flicksener 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                  Trade between nations has been going on for thousands of years, not just several hundred. Civilization was partially founded on trade. Yet it's only within the last 200 years or so, since the rise of Democracy in the West, and particularly in America, that we've seen an explosion in human progress.

                  Your monarchy theory is interesting. You're familiar with Thailand being a monarchy and how that's going for them at the moment, yes? How their (unelected) prince is widely despised by many citizens yet still remains in power due to a fine mix of tradition, loyalty, and propaganda as he continues to funnel billions from his country's coffers to himself and his cohorts?

                  In case you're wondering what he looks like, here are a few pictures:

                  https://miro.medium.com/max/3316/1*KXmePRZEz4-6ZzbmsEM3yQ.jpeg

                  He's the one with all the tattoos and wearing what looks like a sports bra. Stylish fella.

                  At least with Democracy, you can (usually) get rid of crappy leaders every four years and replace them with people who may not be as crappy. Not so much with a leader who claims the divine right to rule for as long as he and his family wishes.

                  [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]tyranicaloverlord 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                    The fuck are you going on about?

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

                    Preach on! Sieg Heil! :-)

                    [–]milkmender11 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

                    I don't think overweight neckbeards quite make the cut for 'master race' but you do you

                    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                    Low IQ post is low IQ.

                    [–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

                    Obese BMI is obese.

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    No, actually, I had an "Obese BMI" when my abs were clearly visible, back before I GOT POISONED.

                    Get yourself lethal levels of mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic and come back to me with how great a shape you're in. Let's talk then.

                    [–]milkmender11 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                    Geez I thought we were just trolling I didn't realize you were actually taking all this so personally. Relax man it's just some ribbing on the internet. Not worth blowing a gasket over. peace

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Fuck off and eat shit.

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    Okay, LARPer.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    Whatever, demented nutcase.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    My memory is quite terrible, and I would describe myself as an eccentric — so yes, that label would suffice.

                    [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    Free speech has been nothing but destructive to humanity.

                    how have i missed this genius on saidit? your previous posts are...something!

                    Faggots shouldn't be allowed to have pride parades to normalize their degeneracy.

                    i dont think ANYONE should be allowed to have parades. theyre fucking stupid.

                    If your speech is harmful to public morals then it needs to be censored for the sake of a harmonious and orderly society.

                    preach it sister hitler!

                    [–]wristaction 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    I wouldn't toss Speech Freedom out altogether. The problem is that nothing is true in an undelimited, pluperfect, cosmos-spanning frame. Everything, be it "free" or "speech", exists between a set of boundaries beyond which their meanings become ambiguous and incoherent.

                    The occupants of Western nations no longer approach cardinal concepts with similar framing. At one point, the things which the LGBT movement now imposes on the culture were not in the frame of "speech". They were included within their own frame of "obscenity". "Free Speech" meant political speech. Reasoned speech. Obscenity was not entitled to protection.

                    This is now inverted: Obscenity is the only absolutely protected "speech". Dissenting political speech is curtailed and hidden behind paper sleeves, blackened windows and euphemisms.

                    The discursive space of the transition from one understanding of "Free Speech" to the other involved a stinking marshland of questionable political speech in which "speech" and "freedom" were dragged out of their frames, their frames demolished. I can understand how this supports the case that Free Speech is a flawed principle. It's not. Free Speech did not twist itself out of place. Nor was it twisted out of place by those native to the culture which conceived it. The people who inverted Free Speech did so out of malice. They need to go.

                    [–]literalotherkin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    This is now inverted: Obscenity is the only absolutely protected "speech". Dissenting political speech is curtailed and hidden behind paper sleeves, blackened windows and euphemisms.

                    Great point. I don't think it's a coincidence either that there appears to be direct connection between the rise of liberty for obscene speech and the decline of liberty for reasoned speech about issues like politics and social matters. I think it's sort of a drug people get hooked on that appears to present you with liberty but is actually a trap. Today we can basically see what would be considered nearly hardcore pornography in the 70's on a television show meant for general consumption but we actually can't debate serious issues at all without gnashing of teeth, charges of various 'isms' and 'phobias' and potential career and social destruction.

                    I don't think those two phenomenon are a coincidence.

                    [–]Canbot 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

                    "Teaching" is probably an intentionally misleading translation by our (((media))). Obviously he is talking about propaganda. They may not be telling kids directly to be trans but they are lying to them about it, painting it as a good thing, and promising a windfall of good things like special treatment and attention if they do become trans.

                    Putting preteens on hormone blockers is possibly the most horrendous thing anyone has ever done, and I do mean worse than genocides and rape. Even long time rape victims don't have a suicide rate as high as trans kids. It is a type of torture akin to PTSD, where the victim blames themselves for horrific things they can't take back.

                    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

                    "Teaching" is probably an intentionally misleading translation by our (((media))).

                    True. The Daily Mail is a terrible source and should be taken with as much salt as I put on my black-eyed peas.

                    Obviously he is talking about propaganda.

                    I considered that possibility, which is why I didn't want to take a firm stance on what the word meant. I don't speak Russian, so I cant just translate it for myself.

                    Obviously he is talking about propaganda. They may not be telling kids directly to be trans but they are lying to them about it, painting it as a good thing, and promising a windfall of good things like special treatment and attention if they do become trans.

                    Like with pronoun mandates, hate speech laws, etc. The elite also tend to fawn over LGBT people and the media has been using "first transgender" whatever to defend Levine from the nursing home scandal in PA (not the same as the one in NY).

                    The media loves to pretend like blue states are utopias where LGBT people have it easy, while red states are these dystopian hell-holes where queer-folks get shot on sight. It's the same tactics cults use.

                    Neither of these pictures are true; LGBT folks get attacked in places like New York, and having lived in deep-red Arkansas all my life — in a rural area that voted nearly 80% for Trump — I've never even been yelled at for being trans.

                    The "trans murder epidemic" is a hoax. Most of the people on the trans day of remembrance list weren't murdered for being trans, and a lot of them weren't even murdered at all! It was debunked by a far-left trans-woman, of all people.

                    Putting preteens on hormone blockers is possibly the most horrendous thing anyone has ever done, and I do mean worse than genocides and rape.

                    I've never liked hormone blockers; it's child abuse and literally stunts their growth. You can't even know if you're actually transgender until you've hit puberty. Most kids who think their trans, or would think they're trans if the media got ahold of them, grow out of it before they're an adult.

                    Even long time rape victims don't have a suicide rate as high as trans kids.

                    It wouldn't be so high if people would quit bullying them. Now, trans kids need to realize that one guy calling you the wrong pronoun ain't the end of the world, but transphobes (for a lack of a better word) need to realize you can disagree while still being respectful. Most adults can respectfully disagree, but kids struggle with that — especially if their parents don't raise 'em right.

                    For de-trans kids, that's entirely the fault of a broken system that doesn't know when to put on the brakes and tell them to hold up before they make a decision they might regret. Statistically, most don't, but enough do to warrant regulation — especially since stuff like SRS is permanent. The left calls it "transphobic," but it helps trans-folks in the end.

                    It is a type of torture akin to PTSD, where the victim blames themselves for horrific things they can't take back.

                    I basically just said this, but that's why I support age floors for stuff like SRS. Personally, I'll probably never have it, but there's a lot of folks who don't want to either, but end up doing it to get their gender marker changed or out of peer pressure (which is very strong in the "community," which, as I've said before, is a cult).

                    [–]tyranicaloverlord 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

                    I would venture to say that people who are called transphobic are being mis-characterized. They are anti-trans. Using the suffix of phobia incorrectly irritates the shit out of me. However, I think you have the right sentiment which we don't see on social media. That being that we can disagree about the trans thing respectfully. I don't care if you want to dress and act as the opposite sex, however I do not have to accept you as the sex you want to choose to be. There is no rights being violated by having that opinion.

                    Furthermore I find it strange that people who focus so much on saying that gender is a construct also use that same construct to define themselves. Do you find that to be odd?

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

                    I would venture to say that people who are called transphobic are being mis-characterized. They are anti-trans. Using the suffix of phobia incorrectly irritates the shit out of me.

                    Ah, yes, "anti-trans" is the word I was looking for. Seems obvious in hindsight.

                    There is no rights being violated by having that opinion.

                    Exactly! What is a human right, however, is freedom of speech — and the woke left wants to take that away. I don't think their goal is as shallow as banning opinions that offend them, but rather to use that as an excuse to normalize censorship and slowly usher in a dictatorship.

                    First, they ban "hate speech," then they mandate pronouns, then they ban speaking out against abortion, then they ban criticism of the government. Everyone except the elite lose out in the end.

                    Furthermore I find it strange that people who focus so much on saying that gender is a construct also use that same construct to define themselves. Do you find that to be odd?

                    Everything about the cultural left is hypocritical and contradictory. They want to destroy traditional gender roles, while simultaneously trying to imitate them.

                    I'm a lot more conservative than most LGBT folks, so I'm of the opinion that traditional gender roles should largely remain in-tact (obviously, stuff like female genital mutilation should be illegal, and women shouldn't be forced to wear Islamic clothing, but western culture doesn't have these flaws).

                    If one defines gender as the way society expects men and women to dress and act: then perhaps it could be considered a social construct, but the reason leftists use such language is in order to justify its deconstruction — even though traditional gender roles benefit society, overall.

                    I'm a descriptivist, which means I don't prescribe how words are to be used, I simply describe how they are used; this same logic applies to gender, as I'll consider someone to be masculine or feminine depending not upon how they label themself, but rather upon how well they fit into the traditional categories.

                    In regards to sex, it's solely a biological label; someone is male if they have male anatomy, and female if they have female anatomy. Again, I describe people based not upon how they label themself, but upon how well they fit into the given categories.

                    Naturally, I see sexual reassignment surgery as hypocritical, as the whole point of transgenderism is the notion that you don't have to have male or female anatomy to express yourself in a masculine or feminine manner.

                    [–]VulptexVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

                    even though traditional gender roles benefit society, overall.

                    They benefit women that is. The whole idea is that men take on all the burdens and responsibilities and sacrifices and are held to high expectations while pampering women and giving them the world and not expecting them to do anything they don't want to. The common retort is that "women have to be pregnant" except they don't have to get pregnant, and even if they did it's nothing compared to what men have to deal with every day.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

                    Without women and the societal expectation to raise children, society would immediately collapse, because next no one would actually raise their kids — assuming they ain't all aborted, which is more likely under the ultra-liberal dystopia we're inching closer towards.

                    Men and women also have different parenting styles, so even if they adopt: a child needs a mother and a father. Mothers tend to nurture their children and ensure they're happy and have all their needs met, while fathers tend to be more strict and ensure their children are self-reliant and moral — at least that's how it used to be, before gender roles were thrown out the window. A single parent or gay couple could fulfill both of these, but it's less likely.

                    To conflate womanhood solely with raising children, however, is overly simplistic, as women are also expected to do other things, such as supporting their husbands and having certain behaviors and mannerisms that can be beneficial in the work-place, government, etc. In regards to politics, men tend to be strong leaders, while women tend to be more compassionate.

                    These truths offend both the left and the right, because they're both so obsessed with hedonism that they want to destroy anything that stands in the way of temporary pleasure. Left-wingers don't want to be told to quit shooting up meth to go raise their kids, and right-wingers don't want to be told their children are more important than their wallet.

                    I probably didn't explain that well, but whatever.

                    [–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                    No, it's just that you shouldn't be forced to be a certain way simply for being male or female. That's in many cases being forced to pretend you're something you're not, and do things you hate. And it really seems to me that the vast majority of this burden falls on males, and males also get the negative roles too while females get the positive ones. It makes sense that nearly every supporter of rigid gender roles I know of is a woman, even though they are sexist. Because contrary to popular belief I think sexism is far worse against men than women.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                    No, it's just that you shouldn't be forced to be a certain way simply for being male or female.

                    I'm literally trans.

                    And it really seems to me that the vast majority of this burden falls on males, and males also get the negative roles too while females get the positive ones. It makes sense that nearly every supporter of rigid gender roles I know of is a woman, even though they are sexist.

                    You obvious don't know very many men.

                    [–]VulptexVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                    Whether someone is trans is irrelevant.

                    [–]IamCleaver 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                    "murders his political opponents" A meaningless accusation

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    saiditter for 7 days

                    Привет, Товарищ!

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    said by one who supports the clintons too

                    [–]wristaction 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    I mean, the US locks up journalists and crushes free speech. The US has political prisoners.

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Yep. Just look at what happened to Snowden and Assange.

                    [–]literalotherkin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

                    This guy literally murders his political opponents, locks up journalists, and crushes free speech,

                    Wow you've swallowed every bankrupt narrative about Putin in existence. Evidence free libel by people with axes to grind make all sorts of outlandish claims like this against him without evidence. as for 'crushes free speech' I mean grow the fuck up. Every culture on Earth does this. Russia has its taboos like any other country on Earth.

                    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

                    By "free speech" in the united states we mean freedom to have drag queen story hour and get blacklisted for speaking out against it. I'll take Putins version any day.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                    By "free speech" in the united states we mean freedom to have drag queen story hour and get blacklisted for speaking out against it.

                    Did the National Bolshevik Party have drag queen story hour?

                    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                    I don't know what the national bolshevik party is, but I'm guessing they didn't?

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                    They're a political party in Russia that was banned for being anti-Putin. Their flag is literally just the Nazi flag with a hammer and sickle instead of a swastika, which tells you everything you need to know about what they believe.

                    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                    Fascinating. What point were you trying to make by mentioning them?

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    When I said "crushes free speech" I was talking about the Nazbol party, and other parties banned by Putin

                    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    Understood. I was pointing out how free speech has fared in the united states, not so good. Speech here is controlled by megacorporations that are doing worse than Putin.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    True. Big tech especially censors people they disagree with, push fake news, and bend the narrative.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                    I find it hilarious how all the Russian shill accounts came out of the wood-works to get offended over my comment. Yall are even more entertaining than the CCP shill accounts.

                    [–]literalotherkin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                    I find it hilarious that like some CNN drone all you can say to someone who is sympathetic to Putin and finds the criticism of him absurd, hypocritical or totally wild speculation without basis in fact is 'muh Russian shill'. Typical.

                    I guess we've both had a laugh then. Win win I guess.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                    Give me one, good reason why the National Bolshevik Party should be banned, and I'll take back what I said.

                    [–]literalotherkin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                    I don't know much about it TBH. From what I understand it's a rather silly, fringe movement without much backing. I think Limonov is quite a colourful character and I have one of Dugin's books. Why he gets so much attention in the West is beyond me though it's rather dull and uninspired.

                    Where did that question come from BTW? What does it have to do with anything?

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    I don't know much about it TBH. From what I understand it's a rather silly, fringe movement without much backing.

                    Pretty much. It's basically just Nazism and Communism mashed together into a barely coherent mess.

                    I think Limonov is quite a colourful character and I have one of Dugin's books.

                    I was considering buying The Fourth Political Theory to learn more about Nazbol.

                    Why he gets so much attention in the West is beyond me though it's rather dull and uninspired.

                    People just think it's a funny ideology. Matthew Heinbach seems to be a real Nazbol, but IDK anyone in the West other than him.

                    Where did that question come from BTW? What does it have to do with anything?

                    When I said "crushes free speech" I was talking about the Nazbol party, and other parties banned by Putin

                    [–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    He's like some well-known US politicians in other words. 🤭

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    Yep, and a lot of those politicians pretend to hate him because they're still obsessed with Russia-gate.

                    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    See the left hand over there narrated by Zionist Jews that work in the exact opposite way for their own tribe... yes, the left is the problem, which we control through propaganda... so come to the right hand, to multilateralism, to Putinism and the Eurasian Jewish congress and we can have a happier world where Holocaust skeptics can finnanlly be imprisoned for good. /s

                    [–]Imperium 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                    Muh evil Putin. Fucking cuck

                    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                    How much is the Kremlin paying you per comment?

                    [–]Imperium 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                    1488 dollars

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    I see you also have a sense of humor.