you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

guns and vaccines aren't 100% effective. you might miss with the gun. you still might get covid with the vaccine

that is fine. The problem is the vaccine has side effects causing heart problems. The gun doesn't. It'd be like if the gun was somehow made in a way that it went off without you pulling the trigger and shot you, a design flaw where even if it was used correctly and safely by the person it still killed them.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's like a gun that could have blanks, or armor piercing rounds.

Also, there's no safety mechanism.

Also, the gun can spontaneously fire at any time after purchase.

Horror stories have been written about similar guns. It's rumored to have nano bots that may take control of your body.

You're not supposed to ask questions about the gun, and you can't work or travel in make places without the gun.

It's probably fine. Nothing to see.

[–]60seconds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's even worse when your vaccine has fires blanks

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's even worse when your vaccine has fires blanks

You're statement assumes the target is a pathogen, as conventional varieties are alleged to.

If that's true, then why modify the person's RNA?

Why not perform long term studies before modifying everyone. Everywhere.

[–]60seconds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean it would suck if you vaccine just had air in it

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's true.

Although, we do know how to treat that.