you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (16 children)

[deleted]

    [–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    awesome! glad you did all that work. guess what? NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THOSE LINKS supports 'missile directly over sydney'. jesus yall just cant get this shit can you?

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Your original claim was "not a single link [...] about this aside from hal turner". If you want to argue "over" versus "directly over" then we can argue that but be honest about your claims.

      i dont even care so much about 'over' vs 'directly over'. none of the links you found say 'missile'. thats not remotely changing the goal posts.

      and yet you were somehow unable to spend less than 5 minutes figuring out fake from not fake. Isn't that hypocrisy?

      when i spent less than 5 minutes initially, nothing has changed since i spent slightly more than 5 mins. so not following you here either.

      [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

      unless i missed it, not a single one of those even mentioned the word 'missile'.

      [–][deleted]  (11 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

        The definition of 'missile' is just anything thrown at a target including rocks.

        China fired a nuclear capable missile over Sydney Australia.

        wow i totally didnt understand that before you cleared it up. you and i both know the poster was implying that china fired something designed to destroy shit over sydney. im not sure why youre intentionally dodging the obvious with nonsense.

        [–][deleted]  (9 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          still gonna keep going with this? 'The Long March 1 rocket is derived from earlier Chinese 2-stage IRBM DF-4, or Dong Feng 4 missile, and Long March 2, Long March 3, Long March 4 rocket families are derivatives of the Chinese 2-stage ICBMs DF-5, or Dong Feng 5 missile. However, like its counterparts in both the United States and in Russia, the differing needs of space rockets and strategic missiles have caused the development of space rockets and missiles to diverge.'

          but continue to explain to me(which you wont)how china was testing a missile to possibly blow up sydney, which is what the poster and terrible source were clearly implying. im not defending china at all, theyre assholes. im calling out bullshit threads, which is beyond basic. youre trying to make something extremely simple complicated with obfuscation.

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            If you had kept reading you would have learned that space rockets are designed for bigger payloads.

            SHOCKING! you mean technology advances so that earlier things can upgrade to carry bigger things? HOLY SHIT! SYDNEY BE ON ALERT, CHINA IS GOING TO BLOW YOU UP!!

            [–][deleted]  (3 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              Are you okay with Australia retaliating by firing a nuclear capable missile over Beijing China?

              Or are you still going to be shilling for communists?

              im going to bow out on this one. the level of retardation is once again where i cant tell if im even talking to a real person. i could hold your hand even more on this, but it will be pointless. so yes, im going to continue to be a communist/chinese/indian/democrat/republican(everything ive been accused of here)shill. dont buy into my propaganda everyone!

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                i shill for nonbullshit, how you havent figured that out is amazing. again, youre making something extremely simple, beyond complicated. ive mapped all this out for you in excruciating detail, and your reaction is 'shilling for communists', lol.