it's like the whole thing was staged or something

submitted by Orangutan from i.redd.it

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

This appears to be a classic case of Lawfare.

A bunch of civil cases, and different people moving against money laundering or fraud or election interference?

It appears to me to be a criminal and fraudster's expected legal troubles.

Curious that these same groups aren't investigating HRC,

For what?

or Biden's billion dollar Ukraine blackmail

No wrongdoing

(and public admission of guilt).

... You might have to remind me of that.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (28 children)

Clearly, you are a shill.

HRC used private servers with classified info. Then destroyed the evidence.
Numerous legal cases where witnesses against her coincidentally die.

Joe Biden Brags about getting Ukranian Prosecutor Fired (1:16).

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

Clearly, you are a shill.

For who?

How is that clear?

Why would a shill spend time on a site with a reach of 2-10 readers when tens of thousands are not difficult to reach on Twitter, Reddit and facebook?

What are you smoking?

HRC used private servers with classified info.

Does that break a law?

Which law?

Then destroyed the evidence.

Well if the evidence is destroyed, maybe that's why they didn't prosecute.

Numerous legal cases where witnesses against her coincidentally die.

How numerous, exactly?

Joe Biden Brags about getting Ukranian Prosecutor Fired YouTube (1:16).

Right. He got rid of a corrupt prosecutor, who wasn't prosecuting fraud amongst politicians.

Good on him.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (26 children)

Right. He got rid of a corrupt prosecutor, who wasn't prosecuting fraud amongst politicians.

Good on him.

You are a shill.

You have completely misrepresented Biden in his own words.

[–]NodeIndependent 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

He does have more shill skills than most. His comments give the impression that he's too intelligent to believe the crap he spews (like the above examples), but he's able to present the lies and leftist propaganda as if he really believes it. The problem with the shills is that engagement is a win for them.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

What up, Node?

He does have more shill skills than most.

"He's" probably a group of 8200 wankers, or similar.

Their combined intelligence is less than ours.

Here's what's worked for me in the past.

An additional step can be used to counter the forum sliding.

As the comment chains extend (slide) go back to your original comment and add a...

Forum Slide TLDR:
Edit 1: Facts: XYZ shill: Lies

Edit 2: Facts: ABC Shill: Lies II

Edit 3: Facts: QRS Shill: Lies III

The general intent of sliding is to get dangerous into off of the page.

Undermine their bullshit.

  • Summarize (TDLR) the significant info of the exchange
  • expose shill lies
  • spoon feed shills their own turds.

[–]NodeIndependent 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Hey Noam. That does sound like a good technique. I think I'm just getting tired of both the shills and need for arguing with them. Maybe that's unfair to the weak-minded who fall for their propaganda? Seems like an endless struggle to determine who gets to control the thoughts and beliefs of the lower (estimated) 80%. This is no way to run a species.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is no way to run a species.

At least, not from our perspective.

That's pretty funny though.

Those who already see the public as tax cattle would like to permanently consolidate control. ...And there's also their busted finance pyramid scheme is about crashing.

So they're all in.

Seems like an endless struggle to determine who gets to control the thoughts and beliefs of the lower (estimated) 80%.

Some of the "smartest" people I know, are hypnotized like the rest.
Maybe the NPC theory is real.

Do you ever wonder if there was anything crazy on those brain-brushing "Covid tests"?

IDK.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It would be really helpful if they didn't believe and act like they're tax cattle. But reality trumps logic and reason.

Some of the "smartest" people I know, are hypnotized like the rest.

It's particularly unfortunate to be hypnotized like the rest. But even the brightest and most perceptive among us are only perceiving fractions of reality.

IQ just measures brainpower, but makes no comment on hackability. It's difficult, at best, to avoid being "hypnotized", as most of us live in a sea of influences attempting to capture our minds.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

You call yourself Chomsky - who is an amazing scholar and a gentleman - and yet you resort to calling people names and to personal attacks, something Chomsky would never stoop to doing. If you're going to be Chomsky, try to make proper arguments that are backed by reasonable evidence. I will look forward to reading anything Chomsky-esque from you.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

I will look forward to reading anything Chomsky-esque from you.

Not one person here cares what you think.

You're also a pharma-pushing Vaccine shill.

Biden called and said you're late for your booster jabs.

Go, and rid us of your foolishness.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Puzzling responses.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Not one person here cares what you think.

How do you know? If I find one person here who cares what he thinks, will you withdraw this claim?

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not one person here cares what you think.

Are you socks' Sock Puppet?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nope.

I noticed you avoided the question: If I find one person here who cares what he thinks, will you withdraw this claim?

Also you avoided this question: How do you know?

But that's related. Because you don't know.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Socks. Caring about yourself doesn't count.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Socks.

You took the money.

Pushing this vaccine lie, and I know you know better.

You will always have blood on your hands.

Sicily The desperate cry of a woman whose mother died immediately after the shot

Someone out there is hurting like this poor woman, and you helped pharma do it.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

No, that's the correct representation.

But you know that or you'd present some other interpretation.

The questions you ignored:

For who?

How is that clear?

Why would a shill spend time on a site with a reach of 2-10 readers when tens of thousands are not difficult to reach on Twitter, Reddit and facebook?

re:HRC used private servers with classified info

Does that break a law?

Which law?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

There are more than ten readers. Why do you comment on a site and belittle the userbase?

And to answer that question, because people like you will do just about anything for money.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

There are more than ten readers.

Good point. This thread has 30 upvotes. If half of them are human, there are, indeed, more than 10 readers. Only about 10 would have read the thread after I posted my comments though. Less in the case of this one.

Why do you comment on a site and belittle the userbase?

To point out that the people looking for shills here are not only dragging down the pyramid of debate, by reducing to ad-hom, but also an ad-hom that's obviously wrong.

And to answer that question, because people like you will do just about anything for money.

That's obviously wrong too. Why do you post stuff that blind freddy can see is wrong instead of engaging in the discussion.

And to answer that question, because people like you will do anything to avoid reality.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Blind Freddy can smell your BS too, in fact, he got a better whiff of it than I did.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

If you think that something I've posted is wrong, please explain what and why you think that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I won't do that, I can't talk to someone when they've got their mind raptured by the mainstream.

You think everyone who reads a thing upvotes it? You think I don't see how you play with words? You can do that elsewhere, but if you try it here, you'll be called out. If you think you are virtuous for coming here and trying to spread the mainstream narrative, think again.