you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Only left-wing media outlets say he identified his wife, child, etc.

You claim that the Vancouver Sun is "left wing"?

What's your basis for that claim?

and only right-wing media outlets say he was jailed just for pronoun usage.

Mass resisitance, breitbard and the federalist?

It's a bit of a stretch to lump them in with media outlets isn't it? Surely we shouldn't be comparing the fake news industry with journalism?

but I only found evidence of him violating the pronoun mandate.

He didn't give the interviews reported on by the vancouver sun?

Furthermore, the left-wing media outlets never provide sources for their claims; I can't just trust them without evidence.

Jesus mate. You just linked to fucking breitbart.

It's hard to find the original videos, since they're banned from big tech for "hate speech," so all I have to work with is one clip I found on YouTube (that probably won't be there for long). There are longer interviews somewhere, but I didn't find them.

Okay. Most plausibly he did both. Gave an interview in which he misgendered his child. To be fair it wouldn't be know to the court if he misgendered his child in private, so that he breached that part of the court order implies that he breached the bit about talking publicly about it.

Even if he broke that part of the order too: it doesn't warrant six months in literal prison, unless he or someone else was sending them death threats —

If the court tells you to do something, and you don't, the punishment has to ramp up pretty quickly. If you keep asking people to comply, it wastes the court's time, and makes a mockery of the legal system if ignoring it is a viable option. You can be jailed indefinitely for contempt in the US. All you have to do to avoid literal prison is do what the judge says while you appeal.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    ActuallyNot is much like socks but doesn't manipulate/deceive yet is terribly misinformed and not as smart (doubleplus ungood), and with their obvious full-on SJW bias while being less prolific ActuallyNot is actually less annoying, IMO.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

      Socks at least tries to make real arguments; this ActuallyNot guy is an obvious troll. He got mad that I said the sky wasn't blue LOL.

      IFIFY:
      Socks at least tries to make real arguments sometimes and pretends to try other times and usually lies about or evades actual debate against his shill agenda biases. ActuallyNot guy is just an obvious true believer SJW asstroll, easily ignored. He got mad that I said his balls were blue LOL.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      He got mad that I said his balls were blue LOL.

      lmao

      [–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Relax. "Misgendering" isn't a thing.