you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Rob3122 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

She supports the removal of historical monuments, she supports immigration, she supports blackliesmatter, she supports fags in dresses, etc. Though I don't think the evidence will make a difference for you.

[–]Yin 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

immigration

Illegal aliens/trespassers, open borders, and white genocide with UN "Replacement Migration" is what AOC supports to be exact. Globalist propaganda veils that with the word "immigration".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

No, this is what Republican disinformation is trying to make you believe.

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Your statement is globalist disinformation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Is it all really that complicated and conspiratorial in AOC's case? No. Everything she's done has been to address the concerns of the 99% and to challenge the 1%. If you read the legislation she's backed, you'd see that. All of the jargon you reference here would have to be founded on acomplicated international conspiracy that favors the 1%, whereas AOC's actions are against the 1%. So all of these theories do not apply to her.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Yin - all of this can be said of Republicans. It's ridiculous that Fox News, Breitbart and other propaganda sites have turned this around in order to claim there are Democrats who are part of these agendas. For example, look at the 40-year trends you mention. How did that start? 8 years with Reagan, 4 of the same with Bush Sr, and 8 years with a very right-wing Clinton, who made so many deals with Republicans, he could hardly call himself the tiniest percentage of Democrat, and then 8 disasterous years with Bush Jr, and then 2 years of reforms with Obama, and healthcare, but the Republicans were in full control of the next 6 Obama years and I think his party didn't do enough to deal with it, and then the Trump Admin puts the US through a sausage grinder, developing an idiocracy unlike anyone had seen in any developed country, driving up debt to 27 trillion, with handouts to Republicans &c, and now the Biden admin, AOC and some others are trying to make some reforms. So why complain? Globalist political agendas &c? Please - if you reply to me again - please note something specific, like a bill that's in congress, or a piece of legislation that you are concerned about. You've lost me with these generalities about global agendas. Yes, of course there are global money laundering schemes, and we can talk about the geopolitics of that problem. But there isn't much to discuss regarding generalities.

    [–][deleted]  (4 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Again with the generalities. If you know so much, why do you have tp push the same oversimplified jargon? BE SPECIFIC, if you have anything to say, and try not to drag down the discussion by insulting users' intelligence. It's weak. You'll be able to discuss what you know it in detail. Ranting about paranoid schizophrenia interpretations of global conspiracies isn't informative. As I noted, discussing global laundering would develop in specific directions. Are there global political agendas and globalists and all that? Sure. What about them? Are you saying AOC is pushing their agendas? If so, what is your argument and evidence? (She's not, BTW.)

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]